Biblical Hebrew Forum

["K Randolph" <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>]

Pere:
Is this a case where when a masculine noun ends in a heh that the heh does
not turn to a tau when a suffix is attached to it? If so, is it a similar
question as with mine concerning Job 37:3?

What do you all think?

Karl W. Randolph.

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:43 PM, <pporta AT oham.net> wrote:

> Hi, dear list members.
> In Hos 7:6 we find )OP"HEM, (male) who bakes them (males).
> I wonder whether H in this word belongs to the root or to the suffix.
>
> In ROD"M (Psa 68:28), which is an analogous word, the H desappears. That is
> why I think the H in the form in Hos 7:6 belongs to the suffix and not to
> the root.
>
> What do you think about?
>
> Pere Porta
> Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain)
>