b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 11:29, a third campaign implied?
- From: "Steve Miller" <smille10 AT sbcglobal.net>
- To: "'K Randolph'" <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>, <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 11:29, a third campaign implied?
- Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 22:51:18 -0500
> From: K Randolph Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 10:16 AM
>
>From my understanding of Hebrew, I expected to see no more than two
> campaigns against Egypt and that the second one did not meet with the
> same success as did the first one. The reason for the failure was
> forces from outside of Egypt.
>
> As for the construct of the sentence, the negative is outside the
> comparison, so that does not change the form of the comparison itself
> nor its meaning. Whereas the positive sense indicates how the two are
> the same, adding the negative merely says that they were not the same.
> And the context defines the "they" as the two campaigns.
>
[Steve Miller] Karl,
most double-kophs are a comparison of three's. Especially those that do not
include a verb between the kophs. i.e.
Gen 22:17 I will richly bless thee, and greatly multiply thy seed, as the
stars of heaven, and as the sand that is on the sea-shore; and thy seed
shall possess the gate of his enemies;
The 3 being compared are Abraham's seed, the stars of heaven and the sand on
the sea-shore. It is not saying that the stars of heaven are like the sand
on the sea-shore, but that Abraham's seed are in number like the other two.
Thanks,
-Steve Miller
Detroit
-
[b-hebrew] Daniel 11:29, a third campaign implied?,
Anthony Becker, 12/19/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 11:29, a third campaign implied?, Harold Holmyard, 12/19/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 11:29, a third campaign implied?,
K Randolph, 12/22/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 11:29, a third campaign implied?,
Steve Miller, 12/25/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 11:29, a third campaign implied?,
K Randolph, 12/26/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 11:29, a third campaign implied?, Lisbeth S. Fried, 12/26/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 11:29, a third campaign implied?, Steve Miller, 12/26/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 11:29, a third campaign implied?,
K Randolph, 12/26/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 11:29, a third campaign implied?,
Steve Miller, 12/26/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 11:29, a third campaign implied?, K Randolph, 12/27/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 11:29, a third campaign implied?,
Steve Miller, 12/26/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 11:29, a third campaign implied?,
K Randolph, 12/26/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 11:29, a third campaign implied?,
Steve Miller, 12/25/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 11:29, a third campaign implied?, Harold Holmyard, 12/19/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.