b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re: Nun-Tav-Vet root
- From: "K Randolph" <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
- To: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re: Nun-Tav-Vet root
- Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 04:36:24 -0800
Isaac:
On 11/25/06, Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu> wrote:
You say: "Biblical Hebrew may have had the spoken structure of CVCVCVI did not specify which vowel was specified by the V above, and I
where each
consonant was followed by a vowel". The designation of V for a vowel
is appropriate in the Indo-European languages where a vowel is a mere
sound. It is patently misleading in Hebrew. You my liberally add the
A sound to a Hebrew word, but not the U and I sounds since they stand
for personal pronouns. You need also to make a distinction in this
respect between nouns and verbs.
don't know enough about your theory to say yes or no to what you say,
but if you are correct, that U and I sounds may have been chosen to be
that V based on your theory.
All I say is that if the BGDKPT letters originally had only one sound,
then many words would be unpronounceable unless each consonant is
followed by a vowel. Examples include Rebecca (modern Hebrew Rivkah)
and Capernaum (Kfar Nachum).
One must beware of applying the crude terminology of Indo-EuropeanOf course.
linguistics (actually Englishtics) to Hebrew.
Karl W. Randolph.
-
Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re: Nun-Tav-Vet root
, (continued)
- Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re: Nun-Tav-Vet root, K Randolph, 11/29/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re: Nun-Tav-Vet root, Peter Kirk, 11/30/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re: Nun-Tav-Vet root, K Randolph, 11/30/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re: Nun-Tav-Vet root, davidfentonism, 11/28/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re: Nun-Tav-Vet root, Peter Kirk, 11/29/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re: Nun-Tav-Vet root, K Randolph, 11/28/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re: Nun-Tav-Vet root, Yitzhak Sapir, 11/28/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re: Nun-Tav-Vet root, Peter Kirk, 11/28/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re: Nun-Tav-Vet root, K Randolph, 11/28/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re: Nun-Tav-Vet root, Isaac Fried, 11/25/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re: Nun-Tav-Vet root, K Randolph, 11/25/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] reading unpointed Hebrew, Isaac Fried, 11/26/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re: Nun-Tav-Vet root, Isaac Fried, 11/25/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re: Nun-Tav-Vet root, Peter Kirk, 11/24/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re: Nun-Tav-Vet root,
K Randolph, 11/27/2006
- [b-hebrew] Sorting Hebrew, Bob MacDonald, 11/27/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] Sorting Hebrew, Peter Kirk, 11/28/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] Comparative Linguistics was Sorting Hebrew, Bryant J. Williams III, 11/28/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] Sorting Hebrew, K Randolph, 11/29/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.