b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Vadim Cherny" <VadimCherny AT mail.ru>
- To: "Dr. Joel M. Hoffman" <joel AT exc.com>
- Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Segol etc.
- Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 11:54:58 +0300
> >Besides, et is a very specific case. Any examples of regular words?
>
> Lots of examples. BEN ("son") has the same alternation. So does SHEN
> (sometimes).
Again, monosyllabic words are special case. Their tzere should reduce to
schwa in constructus, but that would leave the word without a vowel at all;
thus, segol is expanded schwa, not contracted tzere.
> >Again, this is a specific case. Why, by the way, there couldn't be
> >epenthesis at the word end? cotevt - cotevet.
>
> Epenthesis only occurs between two consonants. (Your example of
> cotevt/cotevet is not at the end of the word, but immediately
> preceding the end.)
uh? cotevt - cotevEt
> >The important thing about seghol is that it occurs either in specific
> >epenthetic positions, or with specific consonants. No other vowel is
relates
>
> I don't thinnk so, but segol is certainly is not limited to
> epenthesis, as we now seem to agree.
Strictly speaking, segol appears in epenthesis and as allophonic variation
of short vowel.
Allophonic variation obviously uses and existing vowel, but doesn;t invent
one. Segol appeared in epenthesis, and was incidentally employed in
allophonic variations.
Vadim Cherny
-
[b-hebrew] Segol etc.,
Dr. Joel M. Hoffman, 10/06/2006
-
Message not available
-
Message not available
- Re: [b-hebrew] Segol etc., Vadim Cherny, 10/07/2006
-
Message not available
-
Message not available
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.