b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Yitzhak Sapir" <yitzhaksapir AT gmail.com>
- To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [b-hebrew] oral law
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:39:25 +0000
On 6/22/06, Harold Holmyard wrote:
The idea that there is an oral law equally as authoritative as the
written law is highly dubious to me. You say that this prevents
mistranslation, but it allows the importation of every kind of merely
human idea and even perversion of God's word. God warns against adding
to his word, and a proposed "oral law" does just that. It presents
something as having the same authority as the written word, from what
you say, and thereby adds to God's word.
The claim that there is no oral law is just as external to the Torah/Bible
as the claim that there is. More to the point, and without identifying
the oral law as the Mishna/Talmud, it is very likely that there is an oral
law, simply because any code of law that is written is written in a certain
context, and further generations must interpret that law to allow new
situations to be addressed. While something may have seemed clear
to the author of the law, it may not be so clear to its practitioners several
generations hence. All of this creates the background whereby any code
of law that is written down, has along with it, associated understandings
that are not written down, and also must be interpreted continuously in
further generations.
However, Shoshanna's interpretation of Rashi and Midrash as part of this
oral law is not shared by all Jews. It is an extreme interpretation that
essentially says that Rashi or the Rabbis of the Midrash whom he often
quotes was not a great scholar but simply a scribe who wrote something
handed down to him from the days of Moses. While that may describe
much of his work (much of Rashi is effectively quotes from the Midrash),
he was also a great scholar and a true understanding of Rashi can only
be achieved by seeing all his quoted sources (which are many!) and
identifying which parts he chose to quote, which he chose not to quote,
what he chose to add of his own, and answering why he chose to do what
he did.
And guys, please sign your posts at the end of your posts with your full
name, not just "Shoshanna" or "j anna", and not just at the beginning of
the paragraph which you quote. It makes the discussion easier to follow.
Thanks.
Yitzhak Sapir
http://toldot.blogspot.com
-
[b-hebrew] oral law,
Yitzhak Sapir, 06/23/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] oral law, Peter Kirk, 06/23/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] oral law,
Lisbeth S. Fried, 06/23/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] oral law, Harold Holmyard, 06/23/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] oral law, Harold Holmyard, 06/23/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [b-hebrew] oral law,
Shoshanna Walker, 06/23/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] oral law,
Peter Kirk, 06/23/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] oral law, Brak, 06/23/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] oral law, Harold Holmyard, 06/23/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] oral law,
Peter Kirk, 06/23/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] oral law, Shoshanna Walker, 06/23/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] oral law, Shoshanna Walker, 06/23/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.