Biblical Hebrew Forum

[Bill Rea <bsr15 AT cantsl.it.canterbury.ac.nz>]

Peter wrote:-

>These Cornell people have published their interpretations
>of the data they have discovered, but not the data itself. So their
>results cannot be checked by their peers or anyone else. There is no way
>to check whether their particular matches between different tree ring
>sequences are the only possible ones, or just the possibility out of
>several which fits best with their chronological presuppositions (see
>the quotation below). This failure to publish one's data is bad science.
>And yet everyone thinks they can depend on their results.

Oh, come off it. This is a ***WEB*** site not an article in a peer
reviewed journal.  This is classic anti-science talk, quick and dirty
hand waving objections which require hours to rebut.  I'm out of this
thread.

Bill Rea, IT Services, University of Canterbury \_
E-Mail bill.rea AT canterbury.ac.nz               </   New
Phone 64-3-364-2331, Fax  64-3-364-2332       /)  Zealand
Unix Systems Administrator                   (/'