Biblical Hebrew Forum

[George F Somsel <gfsomsel AT juno.com>]

On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 19:22:19 +0300 "Vadim Cherny" <VadimCherny AT mail.ru>
writes:
> Thank you, Rolf.
> That variety doesn't sound like conforming to the aspect hypothesis, 
> does 
> it? If anything, future tense dominates.
> Much of the present tense could be translated future in Russian and 
> so, 
> possibly be understood as future by Hebrews.
><SNIP>
> 
> Vadim Cherny
________________

Are you saying that if it can be translated as future in Russian then it
can be in Hebrew?  Amazing !  What makes Russian the standard by which
Hebrew is to be read?  Even if you can point to some instances in which
there is a convergence of usage in Hebrew and Russian, this is totally
nonsensical.  Such statements are why I generally delete your posts
without reading -- yours and Karl Randolph's as well.  

george
gfsomsel
___________