b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Read, James C" <K0434995 AT kingston.ac.uk>
- To: "Bryant J. Williams III" <bjwvmw AT com-pair.net>
- Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Kings v's Chronicles
- Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 09:36:41 +0100
Thank you all for your answers. They were very good and brought me much
insight.
In summary:
1) Kings was an adequate history that brought the nation up to the exile.
2) Chronicles was a redraft of the same history with emphasis on forgiveness
of sins which would help the returnees from the exile to understand that Yah
was still with them.
3) Kings therefore has the hallmarks of history written before and up to the
time of the exile.
4) Chronicles has the hallmarks of the same history written after the exile
but with a different agenda.
So the mechanism for the additional parts in the Chronicler's history would
have to be oral tradition which was presumably handed down by word of mouth
within the priesthood???
-----Original Message-----
From: Bryant J. Williams III [mailto:bjwvmw AT com-pair.net]
Sent: Fri 8/5/2005 8:09 AM
To: Read, James C
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Kings v's Chronicles
Dear James,
This may be too theological for the discussion, but look at II Kings 21 where
Manasseh is portrayed quite accurately as to the horribleness of his crimes
against YHWH, the people and the nation. Yet in II Chronicles 33 it not only
describes the same events in II Kings, but added that Manasseh went into exile
and suffered, but asked mercy, humbled himself and repented. This shows that
even one who has sinned as great as Manasseh had can still be forgiven by God
who is merciful. This does not mean the consequences of one's actions are
nullified.
Remember, Israel still went into exile because of the sins of Manasseh.
Rev. Bryant J. Williams III
----- Original Message -----
From: "Read, James C" <K0434995 AT kingston.ac.uk>
To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 3:23 PM
Subject: [b-hebrew] Kings v's Chronicles
>
> Recent discussion have made think about a question I have always had
> but never aired:
>
> Why did the chronicler feel the need to rerecord past history?
> Does chronicles bring any benefit that we didn't already have with
Samuel/Kings?
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>
> For your security this Message has been checked for Viruses as a courtesy of
Com-Pair Services!
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.1/64 - Release Date: 8/4/05
>
>
For your security this Message has been checked for Viruses as a courtesy of
Com-Pair Services!
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.
-
[b-hebrew] Kings v's Chronicles,
Read, James C, 08/04/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Kings v's Chronicles,
Dora Smith, 08/04/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Kings v's Chronicles, Brian Roberts, 08/04/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Kings v's Chronicles, Harold R. Holmyard III, 08/04/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Kings v's Chronicles,
Read, James C, 08/05/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Kings v's Chronicles, Harold R. Holmyard III, 08/05/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Kings v's Chronicles, Read, James C, 08/05/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Kings v's Chronicles,
Dora Smith, 08/04/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.