b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Yigal Levin" <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il>
- To: "b-hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] $PXH/M$PXH
- Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 23:40:45 +0200
Thanks Karl (and all others who answered).
Yigal
> Lisowski listed them as being from the same root, but doesn't hazard a
definition for the unused root. It would make sense if the root has
something to do with family or household life, but that is just a guess.
>
> Karl W. Randolph.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Yigal Levin" <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il>
>
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Does anyone think that there might be a connection between the
> > words $pxh (shifxah - a female slave or "handmaiden", more or less
> > the same as "amah") and m$pxh (mishpaxah - an extended family, clan
> > or phratry)? What is know about the etymology of the two words?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Yigal
> --
> ___________________________________________________________
> Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
> http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
>
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>
>
>
-
[b-hebrew] $PZH/M$PXH,
Yigal Levin, 03/02/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] $PZH/M$PXH, Uri Hurwitz, 03/02/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [b-hebrew] $PZH/M$PXH,
Karl Randolph, 03/05/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] $PXH/M$PXH, Yigal Levin, 03/05/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.