Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] weak verb reference

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Uri Hurwitz <uhurwitz AT yahoo.com>
  • To: Karl Randolph <kwrandolph AT email.com>, b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] weak verb reference
  • Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:18:27 -0800 (PST)

Yes, Karl, most students of the subject would agree with you about what
you call 'the third theory', and in part they would also accept 'the
fourth".
It is impossible here to go into detail, but it is important to keep in
mind that the MT, despite its relative lateness still maintains many features
of the North West Canaanite branch which BH represented. And, apart from the
pronounciation changes that occurred over the generations, those features
were preserved. My point is that the pronounciation of the Masoretes was not
an arbitrary caprice.

Uri

Karl Randolph <kwrandolph AT email.com> wrote:


"......A third theory is that the Masoretes invented the points to record how
Hebrew was spoken at their time. They do not represent the pronunciation of
Biblical Hebrew, rather they reflect the pronunciation tradition 500 - 1000
years after Hebrew ceased to be spoken as a primary language (learned at
mother's knee).

A fourth theory is that the pointings reflect Biblical pronunciation. But
even here there are some variations, as there were no hard and fast spelling
rules during Biblical times.

I think those are all the theories (I expect to be strongly corrected if I
left out anyone's theory). From these, none will have a good set of rules
exactly how to point words in each context.

I personally ascribe to the third theory. ...."

Karl W. Randolph.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Karyn Traphagen"

>
>

---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
>From leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il Sat Feb 26 16:30:01 2005
Return-Path: <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from ismss-1.biu.ac.il (ismss-1.biu.ac.il [132.70.46.150])
by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F13C4C006
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 16:30:00 -0500
(EST)
Received: from xp ([132.70.102.25]unverified) by ismss-1.biu.ac.il with
InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 23:30:21 +0200
Message-ID: <003c01c51c4a$1f3790a0$19664684@xp>
From: "Yigal Levin" <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il>
To: "b-hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
References: <BAY10-F37FED4FEE38EF2949ABA72B1640 AT phx.gbl>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Genealogy of David
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 23:27:50 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-imss-version: 2.022
X-imss-result: Passed
X-imss-scores: Clean:99.90000 C:2 M:3 S:5 R:5
X-imss-settings: Baseline:3 C:1 M:1 S:1 R:1 (0.5000 0.5000)
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Hebrew Bible List <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:30:01 -0000

By the way, the rabbis had the same problem, and calculated that there were
only 210 years from Jacob's descent to Egypt until the exodus. There
solution was the well-known midrash that God had originally intended that
the Israelites spend 430 years in Egypt, but since they cried to him so
feverently He gave them "time off" and recalculated the 430 years from
Abraham's first visit in Egypt.

Yigal

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sesamo m." <sesamox AT hotmail.com>
To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 4:22 PM
Subject: [b-hebrew] Genealogy of David


> Hi all
>
> In Ruth 4:20-22 we find that Boaz' father was Salmon, and Boaz' grandson
was
> Jesse (David's father). In Mathew 1:5 we learn that Salmon's wife was
> Rahab.
> This means that this part of the chain begins before the period of the
> judges. Too few links for more than 300 years.
> Of course, the Hebrew word for "father" also means "grandfather",
> "great-grandfather", and so on, and one can assume that some names in the
> genealogy are not mentioned for some reason.
> But is there any indication of where should those lacking links be? I
mean,
> is there a way (or at least a theory) to know if Rahab was really Boaz'
> mother, or if Ruth was really David great-grandmother? Is there a way to
set
> the story by the beginning of the period of the judges or by the end?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Sergio
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>
>






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page