Biblical Hebrew Forum

[Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>]

On 02/02/2005 22:55, Karl Randolph wrote:

> ... If we accept that $- in Judges 1:6 is a constraction for )$R, ...

Karl, I have twice in the last month or so outlined very strong evidence 
against this assumption. Please answer my arguments or stop making this 
assumption.

As a reminder, I accept that  $- is a synonym of )$R, and thus probably 
the rest of your argument here. But you ruin it by this unjustified and 
baseless assertion.


--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.6 - Release Date: 27/01/2005