Biblical Hebrew Forum

[kgraham0938 AT comcast.net]

Trevor, I don't think he was disagreeing with you, just adding to the convo a 
similar experiance.  Well that is how I took it.
--
Kelton Graham
KGRAHAM0938 AT comcast.net


> ----- Original Message Follows -----
> From: "Maurice A. O'Sullivan" <mauros AT iol.ie>
> To: Trevor Peterson <abuian AT access4less.net>
> Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] verbs in pause
> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:40:07 +0000
> 
> >  >>however, whenever each of these subdivisions is longer
> > than normal,  supplementary marks ( accents ) are employed
> > to make further breaks within  the already broken
> > segments. Song 1:4 is quite a long verse, and the <  bak >
> > in question has two vertical dots above the < b >. These
> > dots are  named "zakef qaton" and are the tip-off that
> > this is a shortened form of <  baka >.<<
> > 
> > I added: >>. So, rather than accusing the NKJV note-makers
> > of eisegesis I  should, I suppose, suggest that they
> > hadn't got to the end of the grammar;  I'm not sure that
> > that's any kinder <g> <<
> 
> I'm not sure why you're bringing up these earlier remarks.
> You only cite them without explaining how they're relevant
> to the present discussion. I have no particular objection to
> them, nor do I see where they add anything beyond my answer
> to the question that was raised. I did not go into the other
> possible accent marks that might accompany pausal forms,
> because it wasn't particularly relevant to the example at
> hand. And what I said remains true--there is more consistent
> correlation between atnach and silluq and pausal forms
> (which was never meant to say, and I don't think I in any
> way indicated, that pausal forms cannot be accompanied by
> other accent marks). Am I missing something?
> 
> Trevor Peterson
> CUA/Semitics
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew