Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] red heifer

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Yigal Levin" <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il>
  • To: "b-hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>, <biblical-studies AT yahoogroups.com>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] red heifer
  • Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 09:17:37 +0200

Most English translations of "Parah Adumah" (Num 19:2) give "red heifer". My
Webster's defines "heifer" as either a "full-grown young ox" or "a young cow
that has not born a calf". Presumably, it is the second that is meant.

As far as I know, a Parah is just a cow, with no special reference to its age
or having had a calf. Does anyone know where the more specific definition of
"heifer" came from?

Yigal Levin
>From Christopher.Heard AT pepperdine.edu Wed Dec 22 03:03:00 2004
Return-Path: <Christopher.Heard AT pepperdine.edu>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from mercury.pepperdine.edu (mercury.pepperdine.edu [137.159.8.35])
by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F044C005
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 03:03:00 -0500
(EST)
Received: from mal-xconn1.pepperdine.edu (mal-xconn1.pepperdine.edu
[137.159.8.42])
by mercury.pepperdine.edu (Pep-6.40o) with ESMTP id AAA00141
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>;
Wed, 22 Dec 2004 00:02:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mal-xconn1.pepperdine.edu with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2657.72)
id <Z14RPD2B>; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 00:02:53 -0800
Received: from [192.168.1.1] ([68.121.183.74]) by mal-xconn2.pepperdine.edu
with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version
5.5.2657.72) id Z14RXZB0; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 00:02:47 -0800
From: "Heard, Christopher" <Christopher.Heard AT pepperdine.edu>
To: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.1.0.040913
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 00:02:43 -0800
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] red heifer
Message-ID: <BDEE6A23.2F9A%christopher.heard AT pepperdine.edu>
In-Reply-To: <010501c4e7f6$6dc40330$53664684@xp>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Hebrew Bible List <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 08:03:00 -0000

On 12/21/04 11:17 PM, "Yigal Levin" <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il> wrote:

> Most English translations of "Parah Adumah" (Num 19:2) give "red heifer". My
> Webster's defines "heifer" as either a "full-grown young ox" or "a young cow
> that has not born a calf". Presumably, it is the second that is meant.
>
> As far as I know, a Parah is just a cow, with no special reference to its
> age
> or having had a calf. Does anyone know where the more specific definition of
> "heifer" came from?

I don't know the historical roots of the translation, but the parah's youth
_might_ be suggested by v. 2 "on which no yoke has been laid." Would having
given birth disqualify the parah from being "unblemished" (tamiymah), v. 2?
I can't really see why it would, but perhaps someone else knows of such a
concept.

Chris

--
R. Christopher Heard
Assistant Professor of Religion
Armstrong Fellow in Religion
Pepperdine University
http://faculty.pepperdine.edu/cheard
http://www.iTanakh.org
http://www.semioticsandexegesis.info






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page