b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "David Kummerow" <farmerjoeblo AT hotmail.com>
- To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [b-hebrew] Re: Hebrew "Nominative"
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:13:41 +1000
Dear Clay,
Your question relates to the analysis of BH as a head- or dependent-marked language. The problem is compounded because BH is a so-called pro-drop language, ie independent pronouns are not obligatory as apposed to English, for example. Perhaps a better way forward than the "appositional" approach is the one put forward by Matthew Anstey (pp.24-26):
http://home.hum.uva.nl/fg/working_papers/WPFG77.pdf
The position advanced here is that both the NP argument *and* the verbal dependent-marking refer. Have a read also of pp.226-232 of William Croft's, Radical Construction Grammar.
One of the benifits of the approach is that in the case of pronominal reference, pronouns are then not so much "dropped" but "added". Unfortunately, however, there is yet to be a serious study of the syntax, semantics, and pragmatics of independent personal pronouns in BH - which is why I have chosen it as the topic for my dissertation!
Regards,
David Kummerow.
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 22:39:57 -0700
From: "C. Stirling Bartholomew" <jacksonpollock AT earthlink.net>
Subject: [b-hebrew] Hebrew "Nominative"
To: hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Message-ID: <BD7CF5BD.18%jacksonpollock AT earthlink.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
"It seems to be the agreed interpretation of many languages with pronominal
representation of all core relations on the verb that any noun phrases
expressing core arguments are adjuncts in a kind of apposition with the
bound pronoun and that the bound pronouns bear the grammatical relations."
Barry J. Blake, Case, Cambridge UP, 1993, page 52.
Thus, in a Biblical Hebrew clause with a transitive finite verb, the
"nominative" noun phrase might be analyzed* as "appositional," limiting the
subject represented by the bound pronoun.
What analytical benefits might be realized using this approach?
greetings,
Clay Bartholomew
*The traditional approach is to view this "nominative" noun phrase as the
subject of the verb.
_________________________________________________________________
SEEK: Now with over 50,000 dream jobs! Click here: http://ninemsn.seek.com.au?hotmail
-
[b-hebrew] Re: Hebrew "Nominative",
David Kummerow, 09/27/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Re: Hebrew "Nominative",
C. Stirling Bartholomew, 09/28/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Re: Hebrew "Nominative",
Peter Kirk, 09/28/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Re: Hebrew "Nominative",
C. Stirling Bartholomew, 09/28/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Re: Hebrew "Nominative",
Peter Kirk, 09/28/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Re: Hebrew "Nominative",
C. Stirling Bartholomew, 09/29/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Re: Hebrew "Nominative", Peter Kirk, 09/29/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Re: Hebrew "Nominative",
C. Stirling Bartholomew, 09/29/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Re: Hebrew "Nominative", Dave Washburn, 09/28/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Re: Hebrew "Nominative",
Peter Kirk, 09/28/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Re: Hebrew "Nominative",
C. Stirling Bartholomew, 09/28/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Re: Hebrew "Nominative",
Peter Kirk, 09/28/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Re: Hebrew "Nominative",
David Kummerow, 09/28/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Re: Hebrew "Nominative", C. Stirling Bartholomew, 09/29/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Re: Hebrew "Nominative", C. Stirling Bartholomew, 09/29/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Re: Hebrew "Nominative",
C. Stirling Bartholomew, 09/28/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.