Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Passive/reflex verbs don't take suffixes??, was: Labials and letter interchange

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
  • To: wattswestmaas <wattswestmaas AT eircom.net>
  • Cc: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.Ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Passive/reflex verbs don't take suffixes??, was: Labials and letter interchange
  • Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 23:20:45 +0100

On 11/09/2004 20:13, wattswestmaas wrote:

Hallo members of the board, Regarding the word SHALOM and SHALVAH.

Is the 'waw' an interchange for the 'mem'? Taking notice too of the
differing roots proposed by another source ie: shin lamed mem for shalom and
shin lamed waw (or Heh) for shalvah.

Thanking you, Chris -- Ireland.

PS thanking you for your comments on my last question posted. Although the
'raw data source' kindly given by you Peter was somewhat bewildering.


Sorry, Chris. This is the official list transliteration, but here is a more user friendly version with references (to the Hebrew text) and the words in question with a user friendly transliteration.

Exodus 20:5 word 4: ta`obdem (hophal)
Exodus 23:24 word 4: ta`obdem (hophal)

Deuteronomy 5:9 word 4: ta`obdem (hophal)
Deuteronomy 13:3 word 13: wena`obdem (hophal)

2 Samuel 21:5 word 8: nishmadnu (niphal) (but does this one really have an object suffix? a more recent WTS morphology apparently analyses as niphal 1st person plural with no suffix)

Psalm 42:5 word 9: 'eddaddem (hithpael)
Psalm 109:3 word 4: wayyillaxamuni (niphal)

Isaiah 14:2 word 5: wehitnaxalum (hithpael)
Isaiah 44:21 word 11: tinnasheni (niphal)

Analyses as in the Westminster morphology, checked with a more recent version.

--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page