Biblical Hebrew Forum

[Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>]

On 03/12/2003 03:11, Jason Hare wrote:

> Peter,
>
> So, would we then--if we accept this version--suggest a hapax legomenon in
> this verse?
>
> Regards,
> Jason
>
>  
I think we already know we have a hapax legomenon in this verse. Well, 
the MT ka'ari is not strictly a hapax, but the Nahal Hever form is. As 
there are already a large number of hapaxes in the Hebrew Bible, there 
is no good reason to reject the suggestion that this is one.

--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/