b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Karl Randolph" <kwrandolph AT email.com>
- To: "Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 23:02:52 -0500
Dear Peter:
Earlier I wrote that I thought that lexographers should write definitions as
the words are actually used, and not according to our philosophical or
theological presuppositions.
This is an example of what I mean. I read some of the verses differently than
Reinier de Blois with the result that I disagree with his detailed
definitions. I agree with the core definition that XSD means kind actions
(often not deserved) but I don’t see “*noun * = attitude of commitment
towards fulfilling one's obligations; these may be obligations defined within
the context of a covenant or agreement, or moral obligations to do well to
someone who did well to you before; ST people, deities” as part of the
definition itself, rather I see most of this as theological or philosophical
reading back into the term the presuppositions of the lexicographer.
I’m reminded of a poet who, when he heard one of his poems discussed in a
literature class, came away surprised at all the insights in the poem that he
didn’t know ever existed. Likewise, most of the definition (I looked at the
site and checked some of the verses cited) I don’t see how he got it.
Karl W. Randolph.
----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
On 20/11/2003 13:21, furuli AT online.no wrote:<snip>
> Dear list-members?
>
>
> It seems to me that it is difficult to abandon terms that have been > cherished for a long time. When I argue in a scholarly context, I > often get the question: "Can you give an example?" It is often easier > to grasp ideas by looking at them from a practical point of view, how > they work. So allow me to ask a few questions regarding the term > "lexical meaning," which often is used without being adequately > defined, and often being used in a wrong way, in my view. In order > to test my claim "that 'lexical meaning' cannot be expressed in > writing or in speech, it must be known (except with very simple > words),' I ask a few questions.
>
> First I use the translational setting: Expressed in English, what is > the "lexical meaning" of the nouns NP$ and XSD and the verb $LM?
Well, if you want to see how Reinier de Blois has dealt with XSD and are talking about "lexical meaning" as he defined it, see the entry XSD at http://www.ubs-translations.org/sdbh/vocabula/ (which covers het only). Here is an extract, covering the verb, the noun, and the adjective XASIYD with five different lexical meanings:
> (a ) */Events /*: /Description B1 /
> *noun * = attitude of commitment towards fulfilling one's obligations; > these may be obligations defined within the context of a covenant or > agreement, or moral obligations to do well to someone who did well to > you before; ST people, deities
>
> ...
>
> (b ) */Events /*: /Description B2 /
> *hithp. * = to act in accordance to [a]; AG people, deities
>
> *...* > <http://ubs-translations.org/sdbh/cgi-bin/vocabula/ref.pl?10,22,26,2;19,18,26,2;>
>
> (c ) */Events > Objects /*: /Description B2 /
> *adjective * = someone who practices חֶסֶד, who is committed towards > fulfilling his/her obligations; these may be obligations defined > within the context of a covenant or agreement, or moral obligations to > do well to someone who did well to you before; AG people, deities
>
> ...
>
> (d ) */Events /*: /Description B2 /
> *noun * = to bring disgrace upon oneself; AG people
>
> ...
>
> (e ) */Events /*: /Description B3 /
> *pi. * = to cause someone else to experience a feeling of shame; ST > people; CA people
>
> *...* > <http://ubs-translations.org/sdbh/cgi-bin/vocabula/ref.pl?20,25,10,1;>
I have omitted the intervening parts which describe contextual "meanings" or use.
--
--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains
, (continued)
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains,
CS Bartholomew, 11/20/2003
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains,
furuli, 11/20/2003
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains,
Peter Kirk, 11/20/2003
- Re: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains, furuli, 11/21/2003
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains,
Peter Kirk, 11/20/2003
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains,
furuli, 11/20/2003
- Re: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains, Karl Randolph, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains,
Karl Randolph, 11/19/2003
- Re: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains, Peter Kirk, 11/19/2003
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains,
Karl Randolph, 11/20/2003
- Re: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains, Peter Kirk, 11/20/2003
- RE: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains, Trevor Peterson, 11/21/2003
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains,
Karl Randolph, 11/21/2003
- Re: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains, Peter Kirk, 11/22/2003
-
[b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains,
David Gray, 11/24/2003
- Re: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains, furuli, 11/24/2003
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains,
CS Bartholomew, 11/26/2003
- RE: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains, David Gray, 11/27/2003
-
[b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains,
Reinier de Blois, 11/24/2003
- RE: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains (WAY off topic), Paul Zellmer, 11/25/2003
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains,
Karl Randolph, 11/25/2003
- [b-hebrew] XESED, was: Contextual Semantic Domains, Peter Kirk, 11/26/2003
- Re: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains, Karl Randolph, 11/27/2003
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Contextual Semantic Domains,
CS Bartholomew, 11/20/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.