Biblical Hebrew Forum

[CS Bartholomew <jacksonpollock AT earthlink.net>]

Trevor,

On 11/15/03 11:57 AM, "Trevor Peterson" <06PETERSON AT cua.edu> wrote:

> This is a 
> lexical category, because it is a matter of how the word was derived in the
> past, not how a speaker would regularly generate it.

A "poststructuralist" might be temped to ask what difference it makes how a
word was derived in the past?


BTW, does anyone have a .pdf version of the following articles **including
embedded Hebrew fonts**?

TOWARDS A NEW DICTIONARY OF BIBLICAL HEBREW BASED ON SEMANTIC DOMAINS
Reinier de Blois
United Bible Societies
Woerden (Utr.), The Netherlands

A SEMANTIC DICTIONARY OF  BIBLICAL HEBREW
by Reinier de Blois
AFRETCON BAGAMOYO 2002

I already have the MSWord docs.

Thanks.

greetings,
Clay Bartholomew