b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Trevor Peterson" <06peterson AT cua.edu>
- To: "'Hebrew'" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [b-hebrew] linguistics, was Re: Prov. 30:19
- Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 18:30:18 -0400
Karl wrote:
> For me, the strongest evidence for Biblical Hebrew is
> precisely the surviving, unpointed, written documents. I
> think the points, particularly in bgdkpt and sin/shin,
> represent a later development of the language from a period
> after when Hebrew was no longer spoken in the home and on the
> street, but was the language of religion and high literature.
Then where do you suppose the rules of pronunciation for bgdkft
consonants came from? If they were from such a late stage of the
language, they did an awfully good job of constructing them as if they
had originated before various vowel reduction rules.
Trevor Peterson
CUA/Semitics
-
Re: [b-hebrew] linguistics, was Re: Prov. 30:19,
Karl Randolph, 10/09/2003
- Re: [b-hebrew] linguistics, was Re: Prov. 30:19, Peter Kirk, 10/09/2003
- RE: [b-hebrew] linguistics, was Re: Prov. 30:19, Trevor Peterson, 10/09/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [b-hebrew] linguistics, was Re: Prov. 30:19,
Karl Randolph, 10/10/2003
- RE: [b-hebrew] linguistics, was Re: Prov. 30:19, Trevor Peterson, 10/10/2003
- Re: [b-hebrew] linguistics, was Re: Prov. 30:19, Peter Kirk, 10/10/2003
-
Re: [b-hebrew] linguistics, was Re: Prov. 30:19,
Jason Hare, 10/11/2003
- Re: [b-hebrew] linguistics, was Re: Prov. 30:19, Peter Kirk, 10/11/2003
-
Re: [b-hebrew] linguistics, was Re: Prov. 30:19,
Karl Randolph, 10/10/2003
- RE: [b-hebrew] linguistics, was Re: Prov. 30:19, Trevor Peterson, 10/10/2003
- Re: [b-hebrew] linguistics, was Re: Prov. 30:19, Peter Kirk, 10/11/2003
- Re: [b-hebrew] linguistics, was Re: Prov. 30:19, Stephen C. Carlson, 10/11/2003
- Re: [b-hebrew] linguistics, was Re: Prov. 30:19, Karl Randolph, 10/11/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.