b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Rolf Furuli <furuli AT online.no>
- To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: h'lhym
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 06:46:55 +0200
Title: Re: h'lhym
Dear Ian,
The Hebrew Bible advocates in my view the belief in many
living gods, but neither polytheism nor henotheism. The seemingly
contradion in my words can be solved if we understand the Hebrew
Bible's presenteation of "the family of YHWH".
This "family" consists of YHWH as the supreme God who
is the only one that should be worshiped; then there are spirit
creatures which are "gods" in a generic sense and others
who are "gods" in both a generic and a religious sense.
YHWH has "sons" who occationally are called
"gods", because, as sons they are "gods" in a
generic sense, but not in a religious one, because they do not
deserve worship. YHWH has other sons who are in opposition to him.
They are called shêdîm (Deuteronomy 32:17 and Psalm
136:36,37) and are "gods" in both a generic sense (they
were created by YHWH) and in a (false) religious sense (they are
worshiped). The idols are completely lifless, but when the people
worshiped idols, they in reality worshiped living "gods",
the shêdîm, who stood behind the idols. (The second
commandmend thus implies the belief in many living "gods")
Paul expresses exactly the same thought i 1 Corinthians 10:19-21: the
nations in reality sacrifice to the daimonion when they
sacrifice to idols.
On this background I would take your h'lhym in the sense
"The God", who has a completely different position compared
with other "gods". So I would translate is as "The
true God". The word 'lhym without article refers in most
instances to "The true God" as well (keep in mind the
difference between "meaning" and "reference"),
but when the article is used, it is stressed that he is "The
true God".
I am not aware of any literature that discusses the matter, so I
have stated the results of my own research.
Regards
Rolf
Rolf Furuli
University of Oslo
Earlier I asked:
>Is there any literature (or any thoughts) on the term
>ha-elohim (with article) as against that without?
and didn't get any takers. Here's some raw data which
might be found interesting. Perhaps someone might find
it stimulating.
h'lhym 'lhym yhwh 'dny
Gen 20 140 128 6
Ex 27 30 298 4
Lev - - 198 -
Num 2 7 286 1
Deut. 5 28 413 2
Jos 3 10 160 2
Jdg 13 26 122 2
Ruth - - 12 -
1Sa 11 34 204 -
2Sa 17 13 115 7
1Ki 21 21 195 4
2Ki 34 26 217 2
1Ch 44 14 112 0
2Ch 47 25 270 0
Ezr 12 - 22 0
Neh 22 3 14 2
Job 3 11 22 1
Ps 3 189 545 50
So - - - 1
Pro - 3 70 -
Ecc 29 7 - -
Isa 2 14 366 47
Jer 2 13 604 13
Lam - - 30 13
Eze 1 11 387 215
Dan 5 - 6 13
Hos - 5 36 -
Joel - - 23 -
Amos - 1 71 23
Ob - - 5 1
Jon 4 4 19 -
Mic - 1 33 1
Nah - - 10 -
Hab - - 9 1
Zep - - 24 1
Hag - - 25 -
Zec - 1 96 7
Mal - 5 36 1
--------------------------------
316 634 5194 420
--------------------------------
'dny has been vetted to remove non-god references
as in "master".
Ian
---
You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: [furuli AT online.no]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-hebrew-12523N AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.
-
h'lhym,
Ian Hutchesson, 07/18/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: h'lhym, Ian Hutchesson, 07/18/2002
- Re: h'lhym, Rolf Furuli, 07/19/2002
- RE: h'lhym, Peter Kirk, 07/19/2002
- Re: h'lhym, Martin A. Shields, 07/19/2002
- RE: h'lhym, Rolf Furuli, 07/19/2002
- RE: h'lhym, Trevor Peterson, 07/19/2002
- Re: h'lhym, Ian Hutchesson, 07/19/2002
- Re: h'lhym, Rolf Furuli, 07/19/2002
- Re: h'lhym, Rolf Furuli, 07/20/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.