b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Re: b-hebrew digest: November 09, 2001

From: "M & E Anstey" <anstey AT raketnet.nl>
To: "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Subject: Re: b-hebrew digest: November 09, 2001
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 10:59:24 +0100

Hi Vince,

you wrote,

> so, e.g., i found in subordination (as i formally define it):
> (1) qatal 100% past tense, perfective, not progressive
> (2) yiqtol 100% not past, not progressive
> (3) qotel 100% progressive (verbal use only)

just to clarify, I would say qatal and yiqtol in subordination are not past
and non-past but anerior and non-anterior, as they do not establish a
r-time. Do you agree?

regards
matthew

Matthew Anstey
------------------------------------------
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Faculteit der Godgeleerdheid
"Werkgroep Informatica"
anstey AT raketnet.nl

+31 (0)20 - 444-6626 (W)
+31 (0)255 - 52-6541 (H)

Re: b-hebrew digest: November 09, 2001, M & E Anstey, 11/12/2001