b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Re: perfect vs imperfect

From: "Dave Washburn" <dwashbur AT nyx.net>
To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Subject: Re: perfect vs imperfect
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 11:36:48 -0700

> At 22-03-2001 18:26 Randall Buth <ButhFam AT compuserve.com> wrote:
>
> > or my hard to get article "Hebrew Verb in Current Discussion" JOTT (SIL
> > 1992).
>
> Randall,
>
> I tried to figure out what the abbreviation might indicate, but your article
> is surely hard to get in this way: what does JOTT (SIL 1992) mean?
>
Ditto. And if it's that hard to get, how about putting it on the Web?
I can help with that if you decide to.

Dave Washburn
http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur
"No study of probabilities inside a given frame can ever
tell us how probable it is that the frame itself can be
violated." C. S. Lewis

perfect vs imperfect, Michael DePangher, 03/21/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: perfect vs imperfect, Dave Washburn, 03/21/2001
- perfect vs imperfect, Harold R. Holmyard III, 03/21/2001
- re: perfect vs imperfect, Randall Buth, 03/22/2001
- re: perfect vs imperfect, Dave Washburn, 03/22/2001
- Re: perfect vs imperfect, Raymond de Hoop, 03/22/2001
- Re: perfect vs imperfect, Dave Washburn, 03/22/2001
- RE: perfect vs imperfect, Peter Kirk, 03/23/2001
  - RE: perfect vs imperfect, Peter Kirk, 03/28/2001
- re: perfect vs imperfect, Randall Buth, 03/24/2001
- re: perfect vs imperfect, Dave Washburn, 03/24/2001
- re: perfect vs imperfect, Randall Buth, 03/25/2001
- Re: perfect vs imperfect, Lee R. Martin, 03/26/2001