b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Randall Buth <ButhFam AT compuserve.com>
- To: "Harold R. Holmyard III" <hholmyard AT ont.com>
- Cc: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: re: perfect vs imperfect
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:26:11 -0500
Message text written by "Harold R. Holmyard III"
>but they are aspects,
in speaking of action as complete or incomplete. Thus both can be used of
past time or future time.<
but they are not 'pure' aspects, either. When talking about future events
the prefix verb is not usually referring to the ASPECT of the event, to an
"in-process, incomplete" event, rather it usually refers to an aspectually
complete (=perfective) event in the future. Thus YAVO is usually a simple
'he will come' rather than 'he will be coming'.
The above is why Jouon mixed categories and called the suffix verb
'perfect' and the prefix verb 'future', to show the incomplete overlap with
either tense or aspect in the Hebrew verb.
maybe recommended that you consult ven der Merwe's new Reference grammar,
or my hard to get article "Hebrew Verb in Current Discussion" JOTT (SIL
1992).
A lot of unnecessary, even unhelpful ink is spilt on this topic.
Randall Buth
Jerusalem
-
perfect vs imperfect,
Michael DePangher, 03/21/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: perfect vs imperfect, Dave Washburn, 03/21/2001
- perfect vs imperfect, Harold R. Holmyard III, 03/21/2001
- re: perfect vs imperfect, Randall Buth, 03/22/2001
- re: perfect vs imperfect, Dave Washburn, 03/22/2001
- Re: perfect vs imperfect, Raymond de Hoop, 03/22/2001
- Re: perfect vs imperfect, Dave Washburn, 03/22/2001
-
RE: perfect vs imperfect,
Peter Kirk, 03/23/2001
- RE: perfect vs imperfect, Peter Kirk, 03/28/2001
- re: perfect vs imperfect, Randall Buth, 03/24/2001
- re: perfect vs imperfect, Dave Washburn, 03/24/2001
- re: perfect vs imperfect, Randall Buth, 03/25/2001
- Re: perfect vs imperfect, Lee R. Martin, 03/26/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.