b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Ian Hutchesson" <mc2499 AT mclink.it>
- To: "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: was Michael -- Re: deuteronomy (Peter)
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 03:20:06 +0100
>>Bill, if the Arthurian legends can preserve something from the
>>Gilgamesh narratives, don't you think it's possible that the biblical
>>accounts can preserve something from 1200 BCE? Our problem is to find
>>ways based in factual data from the relevant period (such for example
>>as the data relevant to the sea peoples who ended up on the coast of
>>Palestine) which can contribute to the extraction of what we can get
>>out of such texts. Without the external hard data, how can we proceed?
>
>I thought that was what you were saying. In the past you've been
>fairly insistent about the unreliability of the biblical texts,
>for example, arguing there is no evidence for a United Monarchy.
>I actually don't have a problem with believing there's a good
>historical core in the biblical texts, just don't ask me to able
>to find it!
This is an interesting conflicting stance, Bill. You talk about a historical
core
and you apparently admit that you could not find it if you tried. It seems
therefore
that it is in no sense historical.
Ian
-
Re: was Michael -- Re: deuteronomy (Peter),
Ian Hutchesson, 03/11/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: was Michael -- Re: deuteronomy (Peter), Peter Kirk, 03/12/2001
- Re: was Michael -- Re: deuteronomy (Peter), Raymond de Hoop, 03/12/2001
- Re: was Michael -- Re: deuteronomy (Peter), Bill Rea, 03/12/2001
- Re: was Michael -- Re: deuteronomy (Peter), Ian Hutchesson, 03/12/2001
- Re: was Michael -- Re: deuteronomy (Peter), Ian Hutchesson, 03/12/2001
- RE: was Michael -- Re: deuteronomy (Peter), Peter Kirk, 03/13/2001
- Re: was Michael -- Re: deuteronomy (Peter), Bill Rea, 03/13/2001
- Re: was Michael -- Re: deuteronomy (Peter), Ian Hutchesson, 03/13/2001
- Re: was Michael -- Re: deuteronomy (Peter), Bill Rea, 03/14/2001
- Re: was Michael -- Re: deuteronomy (Peter), Dave Washburn, 03/17/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.