b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Re: deuteronomy, liz, response

From: "Giuseppe Regalzi" <regalzi AT infinito.it>
To: "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Subject: Re: deuteronomy, liz, response
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 19:08:27 +0100

Peter Kirk wrote:

> Well, don't forget the point made recently that the surface form
> of such details indicated not the original composition but the
> latest redaction. So Vince's observation need mean no more than
> that Deuteronomy was copied by a scribe "ca.600" who modernised
> the orthography, whereas Kings was not copied at that time or
> copied by a more conservative scribe.

But subsequently both were copied many times: how is it that they
didn't undergo any more orthographic modernizations?

Giuseppe

__________________________

Giuseppe Regalzi
Via dei Velieri, 83
00121 ROMA RM
Italy
regalzi AT tiscalinet.it
Resources for Jewish Studies:
http://www.regalzi.f2s.com/uso.htm

deuteronomy, liz, response, Vincent DeCaen, 03/09/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: deuteronomy, liz, response, Raymond de Hoop, 03/09/2001
- RE: deuteronomy, liz, response, Liz Fried, 03/09/2001
- RE: deuteronomy, liz, response, Peter Kirk, 03/09/2001
- Re: deuteronomy, liz, response, Giuseppe Regalzi, 03/09/2001
- Re: deuteronomy, liz, response, Banyai, 03/09/2001
- RE: deuteronomy, liz, response, Peter Kirk, 03/10/2001
- Re: deuteronomy, liz, response, Giuseppe Regalzi, 03/11/2001
- Re: deuteronomy, liz, response, Banyai, 03/11/2001
- RE: deuteronomy, liz, response, Liz Fried, 03/11/2001
- Re: deuteronomy, liz, response, Giuseppe Regalzi, 03/11/2001
- RE: deuteronomy, liz, response, Peter Kirk, 03/11/2001
- RE: deuteronomy, liz, response, Peter Kirk, 03/11/2001
- Re: deuteronomy, liz, response, Giuseppe Regalzi, 03/12/2001
- Re: deuteronomy, liz, response, Giuseppe Regalzi, 03/12/2001