b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Dave Washburn" <dwashbur AT nyx.net>
- To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: virgin: _BETHULAH_ and/or _(ALMAH_
- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 06:41:50 -0700
Raymond,
> Hallo Dave!
> Well, apparently this one is for me. In case you do not like responses to
> your contributions to the list, add that information to you messages. So we
> can ignore your messages safely.
My post wasn't pointed at any individual. If it had been I would
have said so. I referred to the discussion in general.
> And if you want to skip the discussion on lexicography of the Hebrew word
> (lmh and Ugaritic Glmt, to jump to the conclussion that it has to mean
> "virgin" feel free. But do not answer my messages in that case.
I'm still deciding on that one, but I never said it "has to mean"
anything. Please don't do that.
Dave Washburn
http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur
"No study of probabilities inside a given frame can ever
tell us how probable it is that the frame itself can be
violated." C. S. Lewis
-
Re: virgin: _BETHULAH_ and/or _(ALMAH_,
Cyberkotic, 01/31/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: virgin: _BETHULAH_ and/or _(ALMAH_, Raymond de Hoop, 02/01/2001
- Re: virgin: _BETHULAH_ and/or _(ALMAH_, Dave Washburn, 02/01/2001
- RE: virgin: _BETHULAH_ and/or _(ALMAH_, Dan Wagner, 02/01/2001
- Re: virgin: _BETHULAH_ and/or _(ALMAH_, Raymond de Hoop, 02/02/2001
- Re: virgin: _BETHULAH_ and/or _(ALMAH_, Polycarp66, 02/06/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.