Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - RE: virgin: _BETHULAH_ and/or _(ALMAH_

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Moshe Shulman <mshulman AT ix.netcom.com>
  • To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: RE: virgin: _BETHULAH_ and/or _(ALMAH_
  • Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:40:51 -0500


At 05:14 AM 1/29/01 -0500, Dan Wagner wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan D. safren [mailto:yonsaf AT beitberl.ac.il]
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 04:17
> To: Biblical Hebrew
> Subject: Re: virgin: _BETHULAH_ and/or _(ALMAH_
> If the verse is to be viewed in context, which is the
> only basis for
> philological - and not Christological - discussion,
.. except that you should recognize that Christology (Messiahism) is an
important component of Biblical Hebrew thought. They cannot be divorced.
Nevertheless, i will keep to philology for the remainder of this post.

That is ONLY true for those who are evangelical Christians.




------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
moshe shulman mshulman AT NOSPAMix.netcom.com 718-436-7705
CHASSIDUS.NET - Yoshav Rosh http://www.chassidus.net
Chassidus shiur: chassidus-subscribe AT chassidus.net
Chassidus discussion list: chassidus-subscribe AT egroups.com
Outreach Judaism http://www.outreachjudaism.org/
ICQ# 52009254 Yahoo/MSN Messaging: mosheshulman





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page