b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
Re: Sanakharibos in Herodotos - Biblical Implications
- From: Joe Baker <joebaker AT cygnus.uwa.edu.au>
- To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: Re: Sanakharibos in Herodotos - Biblical Implications
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 21:42:14 +0800
Banyai. I agree that the mention of Tarharqa in the account of the siege of
Jerusalem is an anachronism. I agree that Herodotos' Anysis is a reflection
of Hanes (which in the time of Isaiah was a major city of the Tanis
kingdom). But I see no problem with any of this.
But when you say things like
<quote>the Assyrian and Babylonian chronologies have got 18 years shorter
than the Israelite, due to the rejection of 18 limu officials from the late
reign of Tiglatpileser III</quote>
and dating to 703 BC the notion that
<quote>The troops of Merodach-Baladan besiege Assyrian ally Sidon</quote>
I think its time for me to withdraw from the debate
Regards
Joe Baker ===========\
Perth |
Western Australia ===/
-
Sanakharibos in Herodotos - Biblical Implications,
Joe Baker, 06/10/2000
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Sanakharibos in Herodotos - Biblical Implications, Banyai Michael, 06/11/2000
- Re: Sanakharibos in Herodotos - Biblical Implications, Banyai Michael, 06/13/2000
- Re: Sanakharibos in Herodotos - Biblical Implications, Joe Baker, 06/13/2000
- Sanakharibos in Herodotos - Biblical Implications, Banyai Michael, 06/13/2000
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.