b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Polycarp66 AT aol.com
- To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: Re: Exodus, Philistines, contra Bimson & Drews
- Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 22:13:49 EST
In a message dated 2/4/2000 6:51:15 AM Central Daylight Time,
MC2499 AT mclink.it writes:
<<
The Philistines are not really a part of that wave of people who came in
such force that they brought down Hatti, Cyprus, Kode, Karkemish and took
lower Palestine from the Egyptians, so this rationalisation goes. No, let's
make them something more manageable. They were a slim minority who became the
ruling elite on the Palestine coast and really spoke a Semitic language,
notwithstanding the fact that the few examples of Philistine writing is
similar to Linear A which was found in Crete, where Hebrew tradition locates
the Philistine origin, ie Kaftor. Why do these Semitic speaking Philistines
introduce Greek pottery forms into local Palestinian production of pottery --
rather than using the local forms? Why do they introduce non-Semitic burial
customs?
>>
<<
The Philistines are not really a part of that wave of people who came in
such force that they brought down Hatti, Cyprus, Kode, Karkemish and took
lower Palestine from the Egyptians, so this rationalisation goes. No, let's
make them something more manageable. They were a slim minority who became the
ruling elite on the Palestine coast and really spoke a Semitic language,
notwithstanding the fact that the few examples of Philistine writing is
similar to Linear A which was found in Crete, where Hebrew tradition locates
the Philistine origin, ie Kaftor. Why do these Semitic speaking Philistines
introduce Greek pottery forms into local Palestinian production of pottery --
rather than using the local forms? Why do they introduce non-Semitic burial
customs?
>>
Cyrus Gordon predicted that Linear A (not Linear B which was disciphered by
Ventris) would prove to be a Semitic language. Preliminary work that I have
read about seems to prove him to have been correct. That the Philistines may
have spoken a Semitic dialect does not indicate that they were indigenous to
Gaza. In fact, If I read the post correctly, that was never the claim. As I
understood it the claim was that many in Philistia were indigenous but the
ruling class was not -- this would almost undoubtedly be the "Sea Peoples."
gfsomsel
-
Exodus, Philistines, contra Bimson & Drews,
Walter Mattfeld, 02/03/2000
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Exodus, Philistines, contra Bimson & Drews, Peter Kirk, 02/03/2000
- Re: Exodus, Philistines, contra Bimson & Drews, Ian Charles Hutchesson, 02/03/2000
- Re: Exodus, Philistines, contra Bimson & Drews, Jonathan D. Safren, 02/04/2000
- Re[2]: Exodus, Philistines, contra Bimson & Drews, Peter Kirk, 02/04/2000
- Re: Exodus, Philistines, contra Bimson & Drews, Polycarp66, 02/04/2000
- Re: Exodus, Philistines, contra Bimson & Drews, George Athas, 02/06/2000
-
Re: Exodus, Philistines, contra Bimson & Drews,
Jonathan D. Safren, 02/06/2000
- Re: Exodus, Philistines, contra Bimson & Drews, George Athas, 02/06/2000
- Re: Exodus, Philistines, contra Bimson & Drews, Polycarp66, 02/06/2000
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.