b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Bryan Rocine" <brocine AT earthlink.net>
- To: "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: b(l xmh in Nahum 1:2
- Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 22:27:42 -0500
Dear Clay,
I suggest that the construction B`L <....> has the idiomatic
sense "the epitomy of <....>," something like we say
(borrowed from Sadaam?), "the mother of all <....>" as in
"the mother of all wars." See Gen 49:23, 2 Ki 1:8, Pro
18:9, 22:24, 24:8, 29:22, Ecc. 12:11. The polysemy is
definitely worth mentioning!
Shalom,
Bryan
you wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have spent the last few months doing a study of cosmic
combat motifs
> in the OT and NT. I am currently looking at Nahum 1:2-11.
Don't quite
> know what to do with b(l xmh in Nah. 1:2. Looks like b(l
could be taken
> as a name or as a regular noun. If taken as a noun then we
have several
> translation options (lord, owner, etc.).
>
> I don't know Hebrew syntax well enough to determine if b(l
xmh could be
> taken as a chaistic parallel structure with nqm yhwh. If
we were to take
> it as a parallel structure then what impact would that
have on our
> understanding of b(l?
>
> Is it possible that our Prophet might have introduced
intentional
> polysemy with the word b(l? Given that b(l crops up here
in a cosmic
> combat context it is tempting to discover here something
more than the
> sense "owner or possessor." Can anyone give me reasons why
this
> temptation should be resisted?
>
>
> --
> Clayton Stirling Bartholomew
> Three Tree Point
> P.O. Box 255 Seahurst WA 98062
>
-
b(l xmh in Nahum 1:2,
clayton stirling bartholomew, 01/01/2000
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: b(l xmh in Nahum 1:2, Jim West, 01/02/2000
- Re: b(l xmh in Nahum 1:2, Ben Crick, 01/02/2000
- Re: b(l xmh in Nahum 1:2, peter_kirk, 01/02/2000
- Re: b(l xmh in Nahum 1:2, clayton stirling bartholomew, 01/02/2000
- Re: b(l xmh in Nahum 1:2, Ben Crick, 01/03/2000
- Re: b(l xmh in Nahum 1:2, Bryan Rocine, 01/03/2000
- Re: b(l xmh in Nahum 1:2, clayton stirling bartholomew, 01/04/2000
- Re[2]: b(l xmh in Nahum 1:2, peter_kirk, 01/04/2000
- Re[2]: b(l xmh in Nahum 1:2, Ben Crick, 01/04/2000
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.