b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "George Athas" <gathas AT mail.usyd.edu.au>
- To: "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Luz and Lud
- Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 08:00:13 +1100
> I can only give a secondary source, but Cyrus Gordon on p. 30 of
> the first fascicle of his Ugaritic Textbook gives a chart of various
> consonant-changes (or variations, if one prefers) among several
> semitic languages including Arabic, Ugaritic, Ethiopic, Hebrew,
> Aramaic and Akkadian (which he spells Accadian). In the second
> column, soft d (d with an underscore in his transliteration pattern)
> is the same sound in Arabic and a couple of Ugaritic texts, hard d
> in Ugaritic and Aramaic but z in Ethiopic, Hebrew and Accadian as
> well as what he calls "Old Aramaic divergences." See also the
> discussion on p. 26-27. So there does seem to be some prima
> facie phonetic evidence for such a sound variation. Beyond that, I
> can't say with any certainty.
>
>
> Dave Washburn
Yes, there certainly is the development in the orhtography of the consonantal
sign of
soft-d between zayin and daleth in Aramaic. I'm just wandering whether we can
apply this
development to the two names Luz and Lud in the Hebrew Bible. And if so, what
does this
imply for the texts and their date?
Best regards,
George Athas
Dept of Semitic Studies,
University of Sydney
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Tel Dan Inscription Website
http://members.xoom.com/gathas/teldan.htm
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
< gathas@ mail.usyd.edu.au >
-
Luz and Lud,
George Athas, 12/05/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Luz and Lud, Dave Washburn, 12/06/1999
- Re: Luz and Lud, George Athas, 12/06/1999
- Re[2]: Luz and Lud, peter_kirk, 12/07/1999
- Re: Luz and Lud, Dave Washburn, 12/07/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.