b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: peter_kirk AT sil.org
- To: <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Psa 16:10; chasideycha
- Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 21:54:17 -0500
The BHS text at this point in Psalm 16:10 is X:ASIYD:KF (in your
transliteration this would be chasidkha), which is singular - no yod
before the -kha ending. There is no textual note in BHS, and no note
in HOTTP or the Word commentary. But are there other MSS, printed
editions or translations which have a plural here? Could this be a
correction, or an interpretation, to get away from the Christian
understanding of this verse, in Acts 13:35?
Peter Kirk
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Psa 16:10; chasideycha
Author: <devious AT carol.net> at Internet
Date: 30/11/1999 00:00
Greetings,
Could someone point me in the right direction with this, I am not a Hebrew
scholar.
Isn't chasideycha plural? And if it plural then why is it translated in the
singular?
Gratefully,
Lee Deavers
---
You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: Peter_Kirk AT sil.org
To unsubscribe, forward this message to
$subst('Email.Unsub')
To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.
-
Psa 16:10; chasideycha,
Lee Deavers, 11/30/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Psa 16:10; chasideycha, peter_kirk, 12/01/1999
- Re: Psa 16:10; chasideycha, Numberup, 12/02/1999
- Re[2]: Psa 16:10; chasideycha, peter_kirk, 12/02/1999
- Re: Psa 16:10; chasideycha, Lee R. Martin, 12/02/1999
- Re[2]: Psa 16:10; chasideycha, Ben Crick, 12/02/1999
- Re[2]: Psa 16:10; chasideycha, Ben Crick, 12/03/1999
- Re: Psa 16:10; chasideycha, Numberup, 12/03/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.