b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Henry Churchyard <churchyh AT ccwf.cc.utexas.edu>
- To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: Re: Jerusalem, neuter plural
- Date: Sun, 5 Sep 1999 05:25:23 -0500 (CDT)
> From ronning AT nis.za Sun Sep 5 05:14:34 1999
> Subject: Re: Jerusalem, neuter plural
> From: John Ronning <ronning AT nis.za>
> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 1999 21:26:38 +0200
> Doesn't the fact that it's spelled without the YOD 99+% of the time
> (plus the LXX spelling plus the Aramaic spelling) show that in fact this
> pronunciation is late and contrived?
So does the fact that David is spelled without yodh consistently in
the books of Samuel and Kings mean that his name was originally "Dude"? ;-)
--
Henry Churchyard churchyh AT ccwf.cc.utexas.edu http://www.crossmyt.com/hc/
-
Re: Jerusalem, neuter plural,
Joe A. Friberg, 09/02/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re[2]: Jerusalem, neuter plural, peter_kirk, 09/03/1999
- Re: Jerusalem, neuter plural, John Ronning, 09/04/1999
- Re: Jerusalem, neuter plural, Henry Churchyard, 09/05/1999
- Re: Jerusalem, neuter plural, Numberup, 09/05/1999
- Re: Jerusalem, neuter plural, John Ronning, 09/05/1999
- Re: Jerusalem, neuter plural, John Ronning, 09/05/1999
-
Re: Jerusalem, neuter plural,
Jim West, 09/05/1999
- Re: Jerusalem, neuter plural, John Ronning, 09/05/1999
- Re: Jerusalem, neuter plural, Jim West, 09/05/1999
-
Re: Jerusalem, neuter plural,
Jim West, 09/05/1999
- Re: Jerusalem, neuter plural, John Ronning, 09/07/1999
- Re: Jerusalem, neuter plural, Tony Prete, 09/05/1999
- Re: Jerusalem, neuter plural, Jonathan D. Safren, 09/06/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.