b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: John Ronning <ronning AT nis.za>
- To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: The form of weqatal (really wayyiqtol)
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 04:07:39 +0200
Dave wrote:
> <snip>
> >
> > Dave, you're asking us to believe that wayyiqtol is a verb form that (1)
> > NEVER takes the conjunction, though all other verb forms do; (2) NEVER
> > is preceded by things that precede other verbs like KIY, 'ASHER, LO',
> > etc. etc.
>
> I see nothing extraordinary about (2), since it's well known that
> wayyiqtol in fact isn't preceded by any of these particles.
It's not extraordinary if the WA- of wayyiqtol is the familiar conjunction,
but it is
extremely extraordinary, odd, and unbelievable if it's not. How do you
explain that
wayyiqtol is a finite verb form that is never in the whole Hebrew Bible
negated?
Why doesn't Gen 1:5 read
wayyiqra' Elohim la'or yom, welaxoshek wayyiqra laylah
Similar question for thousands of other examples!
You're serious about this?
John
-
Re: The form of weqatal (really wayyiqtol),
Henry Churchyard, 08/13/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: The form of weqatal (really wayyiqtol), Dave Washburn, 08/13/1999
- Re: The form of weqatal (really wayyiqtol), Henry Churchyard, 08/14/1999
- Re: The form of weqatal (really wayyiqtol), John Ronning, 08/14/1999
- Re: The form of weqatal (really wayyiqtol), Dave Washburn, 08/14/1999
- Re: The form of weqatal (really wayyiqtol), Dave Washburn, 08/15/1999
- Re: The form of weqatal (really wayyiqtol), John Ronning, 08/15/1999
- Re: The form of weqatal (really wayyiqtol), Dave Washburn, 08/16/1999
- Re: The form of weqatal (really wayyiqtol), Henry Churchyard, 08/16/1999
- Re: The form of weqatal (really wayyiqtol), Dave Washburn, 08/16/1999
- Re[2]: The form of weqatal (really wayyiqtol), peter_kirk, 08/18/1999
- Re: Re[2]: The form of weqatal (really wayyiqtol), Dave Washburn, 08/18/1999
- Re[4]: The form of weqatal (really wayyiqtol), peter_kirk, 08/19/1999
- Re: Re[4]: The form of weqatal (really wayyiqtol), Dave Washburn, 08/19/1999
- Re: Re[4]: The form of weqatal (really wayyiqtol), Henry Churchyard, 08/20/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.