b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: peter_kirk AT SIL.ORG
- To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: Re[2]: OT Trnity ?
- Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 00:22:07 -0500
Dear Menachem,
Thank you for your clarifications. But I still think the example below
would at least tend to encourage rather than discourage the spread
(among unsophisticated Jews who heard this Targum read in the
synagogue) of the teaching that God's "word" (or "statement") was a
separate entity active in creation, in some sense a divine person but
distinct from YHWH. That is where John's gospel starts. I guess where
it goes beyond the bound of acceptable Judaism is in identifying that
"word" with an individual human being.
Peter Kirk
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: OT Trnity ?
Author: mbrody AT earthling.net at internet
Date: 04/03/1999 13:29
<snip>
Genesis 1:27 "vYEVRA ELOKIM ET haADAM"
Targum Yerushalmi: "vYEVRA HASHEM bMAMARO ET haADAM"
in order to avoid saying "G-d created the man" [as if He personally created
in a human sense], but rather "G-d created the man by his statement" [again
an intermediary between Source and result].
<snip>
-
Re: OT Trnity ?,
M. Brody, 03/03/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re[2]: OT Trnity ?, peter_kirk, 03/03/1999
- Re: OT Trnity ?, M. Brody, 03/04/1999
- Re[2]: OT Trnity ?, peter_kirk, 03/05/1999
- Re: OT Trnity ?, Irene Riegner, 03/06/1999
- Re: OT Trnity ?, Will Wagers, 03/06/1999
- Re: OT Trnity ?, Irene Riegner, 03/06/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.