b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Peter_Kirk AT SIL.ORG
- To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: Re[3]: wayyiqtol test, dave:necessary
- Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 15:11:04 -0500 (EST)
Dear Galia,
Thank you for your helpful comments, also for Bryan's further comment.
Just to clarify things, I was not trying to suggest a perfect
correspondence, rather that the differences were not great and that it
might be instructive to examine them. It still seems to me that for
non-stative verbs the difference is small: simple past and wayyiqtol
are generally sequential but can be used (though perhaps not
preferred) for past within past; whereas the preferred form for past
within past is past perfect and X-qatal. One more difference is that
in Hebrew X-qatal is continued with wayyiqtol, whereas English
continues with past perfect.
Peter Kirk
-
Re[2]: wayyiqtol test, dave:necessary,
Galia Hatav, 03/01/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Re[2]: wayyiqtol test, dave:necessary, Bryan Rocine, 03/01/1999
- Re[3]: wayyiqtol test, dave:necessary, Peter_Kirk, 03/02/1999
- Re: Re[3]: wayyiqtol test, dave:necessary, Moon-Ryul Jung, 03/02/1999
- Re: Re[3]: wayyiqtol test, dave:necessary, Dave Washburn, 03/02/1999
- Re: Re[3]: wayyiqtol test, dave:necessary, Dave Washburn, 03/02/1999
- Re: Re[2]: wayyiqtol test, dave:necessary, Galia Hatav, 03/02/1999
- Re: Re[3]: wayyiqtol test, dave:necessary, Galia Hatav, 03/02/1999
- Re: Re[3]: wayyiqtol test, dave:necessary, Moon-Ryul Jung, 03/02/1999
- Re[5]: wayyiqtol test, dave:necessary, peter_kirk, 03/02/1999
- Re[5]: wayyiqtol test, dave:necessary, peter_kirk, 03/02/1999
- Re: Re[3]: wayyiqtol test, dave:necessary, Dave Washburn, 03/02/1999
- Re: Re[3]: wayyiqtol test, dave:necessary, Galia Hatav, 03/03/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.