b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Peter_Kirk AT SIL.ORG
- To: ronning AT ilink.nis.za, b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: Re[2]: over and under-specification
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 11:14 -0500 (EST)
I'm not sure how relevant this is to John's question, but (as Rolf
pointed out recently in a separate thread) it seems that many
languages including Hebrew use a past form in irrealis conditional
sentences, and also in ones where the condition is only implied. In
English one can even say "Tomorrow's meeting would/could have been
difficult" (in the context that we have just heard that some problem
has been solved). Similarly one could translate Genesis 18:12 with a
"Could I...?" type question - past in form. So perhaps the suffix
tense here is this past form with irrealis meaning.
Peter Kirk
-
over and under-specification,
Bryan Rocine, 01/01/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: over and under-specification, Paul Zellmer, 01/01/1999
- Re: over and under-specification, John Ronning, 01/09/1999
-
Re: over and under-specification,
Bryan Rocine, 01/09/1999
- Re: over and under-specification, John Ronning, 01/11/1999
- Re[2]: over and under-specification, Peter_Kirk, 01/09/1999
- Re[2]: over and under-specification, Peter_Kirk, 01/11/1999
-
Re: over and under-specification,
Bryan Rocine, 01/11/1999
- Re: over and under-specification, John Ronning, 01/12/1999
- Re: over and under-specification, Bryan Rocine, 01/12/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.