b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: yochanan bitan <ButhFam AT compuserve.com>
- To: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: ruth 1.17 oath
- Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 07:49:39 -0500
here is a possibly ambiguous oath, with a footnote that is given to
students:
ko ya`ase Y"H li vexo yosif
ki ha-mavet yafrid beni uvenex
for b-hebrew:
a. thus may He do and double do...[if I do otherwise]...,
indeed death will be what separates us [nothing else].
b. thus may He do and double do
if even death will separate us. [i.e. death will not separate us]
my own answer from a footnote for students:
ki after the curse/oath formula generally introduces something
affirmed. Here it is death and only death that will separate Ruth from
No`omi.
For the oath to mean 'if even death would separate...', 'even death
will not...'
one would have expected im 'if' [=certainly NOT] or possibly ki-im (cf. 2
Sm 3.35).
Cf. 1 Sm 14.44, 20.13, 2 Sm 3.9, 1 K 2.23, 19.2 (19.2 with plural
verbs for gods!).
In oaths in general, im will introduce the condition being sworn
against (=he will NOT do it), while
im-lo will introduce something that the person swears to not let not happen
(=he will certainly do it).
-
ruth 1.17 oath,
yochanan bitan, 12/27/1998
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Ruth 1.17 oath, Ben Crick, 12/27/1998
- Re: ruth 1.17 oath, Peter_Kirk, 12/28/1998
- Re: ruth 1.17 oath, SheMichael, 12/28/1998
- Re: ruth 1.17 oath, HarryJ_Harm, 12/30/1998
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.