b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Paul Zellmer <zellmer AT cag.pworld.net.ph>
- To: B-hebrew list <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Cc: Lewis Reich <LBR AT sprynet.com>
- Subject: Re: Beguiled in Gen 3:13
- Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 22:58:25 +0800
Lewis Reich wrote:
> On 26 Sep 98, at 19:27, Paul Zellmer wrote:
>
> > The question had to do with the meaning of N$). Are you suggesting a
> > different meaning *of the word* due to different construction?
>
> No, I was just curious about the different construction.
Just to remind ourselves, these are the three portions in question:
Gen 3:13 HaNNfXf$ Hi$$iY)aNiY Wf)oK"L
2Ki 18:29 )aL Ya$$iY) LfKeM
Jer 4:10 Ha$") Ha$"(Tf Lf(fM
Lewis, your question concerns the use of the preposition [L] in the latter
two when
contrasted to the pronominal suffix in the former, right?
The parallel passage for 2Ki is 2Ch 32:15. Here the phrase is:
)aL-Ya$$iY) )eTKeM
which appears to parallel the Gen 3 example. Is 36:10, another parallel
passage, uses
the lamed again. However, 2 Kings 19:10 and Isaiah 37:10, which both has God
as the
supposed deceiver, both use the suffixed personal pronoun. My guess is that
N$) can
use either form (direct or indirect) to mark its object.
HTH,
Paul
--
Paul and Dee Zellmer, Jimmy Guingab, Geoffrey Beltran
Ibanag Translation Project
Cabagan, Philippines
zellmer AT faith.edu.ph
-
Re: Beguiled in Gen 3:13,
Paul Zellmer, 09/25/1998
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Beguiled in Gen 3:13, Lewis Reich, 09/25/1998
- Re: Beguiled in Gen 3:13, Paul Zellmer, 09/26/1998
- Re: Beguiled in Gen 3:13, Lewis Reich, 09/26/1998
-
Re: Beguiled in Gen 3:13,
Paul Zellmer, 09/27/1998
- Re: Beguiled in Gen 3:13, Paul Zellmer, 09/27/1998
- Re: Beguiled in Gen 3:13, Lewis Reich, 09/27/1998
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.