Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] /usr merge

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] /usr merge
  • Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:27:11 -0600

On 02/07/2012 04:36 AM, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
> :2012-02-07T11:16:Ladislav Hagara:
>
>> any plan with /usr merge [1]?
>> Personally I don't like it but I am a realist. We have no chance to
>> change the upstream.
>> New versions of crucial upstream packages rely on /usr merge.
>> Do we want to use devel-udev-kmod git branch by the same way as
>> devel-xorg-modular or we plan to integrate it soon?
>
> As this is only a Fedora idiocy I see no reason to follow it at all.

Forgive me, but I don't think you actually read the article.

See the Myths and Facts section.



This is in the RFC stage, so it might be wise to keep an eye on it.
If/when many upstream projects start converting it might be easier for
us to use a similar paradigm.

David

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page