Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] "staging" grimoire instead of devel for development spells as opposed to WIP spells?

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Mathieu L." <lejatorn AT smgl.homelinux.net>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] "staging" grimoire instead of devel for development spells as opposed to WIP spells?
  • Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:01:14 +0100

On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 11:18:00AM -0800, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting "Mathieu L." <lejatorn AT smgl.homelinux.net>:
> > I totally concur here. I think stable grimoire is already not "stable"
> > enough so the efforts should be concentrated on improving the quality of
> > test and stable grimoires. The developement and testing of really
> > experimental stuff should be left for confirmed gurus like you two or
> > for really motivated ppl who can still access Sandalle grimoire or
> > yours. Maybe a wiki page (unless it's already done) on how to access
> > both your grimoires would be adequate.
>
> Some of the personal grimoires are already listed:
> http://wiki.sourcemage.org/index.php?page=Personal+Grimoires
>
> As for stabalizing stable, it'd help if people filed bugs for what was
> broken in
> stable and note whether or not it was already fixed in test. ;)
>
> -sandalle

>From what I've experienced, the flaw in the way we update stuff is that
even users in stable are somehow "testing" the stable grimoire because
even if a spell is "clean" in test doesn't insure it will work fine in
stable.
Of course, I'm pointing this out and I have no immediate solution,
however an idea just occured to me: we could have a distinction between devs
who use stable grimoire (or willingly users) and real "simple" users who
wants the least hassle. For each spell there would be a kind of
"pre-release" of the stable version for a pool of ppl to test it
(I would be one of those for example, as I'm using stable grimoire) and,
say a week later, it would be "officially" released. That could decrease
the number of annoying glitches users run into when updating.

I'm mainly proposing that for the future, because atm I think we have a
pretty high devs/users ratio, but if smgl really grows to have a large
user base this ration will notably decrease and I guess a lot of users
would be happy to have an smgl which just updates smoothly.

Whadya all think about that?

Cheers,
Mathieu.

--
We are Microsoft. Linux is irrelevant.
Openness is futile. Prepare to be assimilated.
--




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page