Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

permaculture - Re: [permaculture] NAPC: Scarcity?

permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: permaculture

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Koreen Brennan <cory8570@yahoo.com>
  • To: permaculture <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [permaculture] NAPC: Scarcity?
  • Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2014 19:55:38 -0700

Thanks for this conversation - I'm hoping that many more like it happen at
NAPC, and before and after. That is one reason I have been spending the
dozens of hours the core organizers are putting in on this to make it happen.

As Loren says, there are multiple factors to consider (and the following is
my opinion only, not an official pronouncement from NAPC). 

1. This is the first NAPC that has ever been done - we don't know what the
market will bear so we started low. We also got a late start organizing and
starting from scratch, we felt we needed to spend some time doing some
internal organizing. There were and still are many unknowns. To commit to
paying speakers their going rate when we ourselves would be putting in not 40
hours but more like 800+ hours each  - on a volunteer basis unless or until
we met all other expenses - seems unfair and impractical to me. We are not
doing this as a commercial model, like "Voices" (and I don't think it is the
best analogy to compare us to them - we are doing a completely different
activity and purpose). It can be lot of pressure for someone to book even one
outside speaker and make enough sales to make it worthwhile. How much more
pressure would it be to book a few dozen, our first time out of the gate?  We
are all busy professionals and have day jobs, and are doing
this part time. We had to make some judgement calls, and we did so. We
figured that no matter what we did, we would disappoint some people.

2. For me personally, it was more important to get a wide diversity there
than just people who could afford higher ticket prices. For those who are
already financially successful, it may be unreal that many people are
struggling to create careers in a field that is far from mainstream or
recognized in many areas, but what Loren says is true - for many people,
price is a deciding factor. Should permaculture only be for those who can
afford or are willing to pay mainstream corporate prices for events? I can
only scratch the surface on this issue. I agree that our field should be
garnering much more money than we are, and I am working toward that in my own
region. But we're trying to do something a bit different with this event. 

3. We are focused on making this more of a community event than presentation
forum. There are many more panels, round tables, open spaces, gatherings,
breakouts, etc than presenters. We have a lot to work out amongst ourselves.
This issue of making a decent living in permaculture is just one of many
issues that concern a lot of us.  I think we need to have some conversations
about these matters as a movement - how can we work together to create a
better design for professionals than what we have now? How can we expand our
delivery and effectiveness? How can we collaborate more effectively on many
of the issues confronting this planet? What are all of our options? 

4. As Loren pointed out, money is far from the only yield at an event like
this. We are hoping to see many, many yields come from this event, and I
personally feel that some of them will be far more important than fees that
any of us may or may not get paid. 

Best, 

Koreen Brennan






 

Koreen Brennan


Permaculture Design and Consulting, Florida
Permaculture Design Courses - Tampa Bay and Costa Rica
Natural Building Pine Ridge Lakota Reservation
Edible Landscape Advanced Course
Financial Permaculture

www.growpermaculture.com
www.facebook.com/growpermaculturenow



On Sunday, August 3, 2014 10:13 PM, loren luyendyk <loren@sborganics.com>
wrote:






Toby- you bring up good points, but I think you may be missing an important
one.  This is not about scarcity, it is about reality.  $150 is a lot of
money to some people, especially when you consider travel to get to the event.

I was one proponent of keeping the cost of the event low enough so that folks
from "the rest of the Americas" could join (especially after the way
overpriced Cuba IPC).  This event is not just for well-to-do USAliens, it is
the NORTH AMERICAN Permaculture Convergence.  There are other countries in
North America other than the USA and Canada, "the rest of them" (ie Mexico)
will sadly not be equally represented because of- you guessed it- money. 

And what about the rest of the PC movement, the other 99%?  Those who are
just getting started, or those who are not as fortunate as some of us, who
may have travels expenses that far exceed the cost of the event- so in effect
it becomes a $1000+ affair?  Many in the PC movement deliberately avoid
making money (reduce the need to earn) because they are not into supporting a
degenerative, fiat based currency system.  Also, many are on the frontier,
are pioneers in their area (geographically) or field, who are waiting for the
rest of the world to catch up.  For this reason they may not earn what they
deserve, or will soon.

It is easy for us to type on our $1200 computers how we should be compensated
for our work in order to obtain a yield (ie pay off the computer).  Is money
the only yield here?  What about inspiring the up and comers?  What about
sharing what works and what doesn't with your peers?  What about tithing?  I
can think of dozens of other yields that will be harvested that far outweigh
the speakers fee.

I am honored to be a speaker at this event.  I am honored to do it for free. 
I get paid very well with my work as a permaculture designer and teacher, and
I am able to subsidize my trip to the NAPC with this income.  I am glad to
support this historic event in this way.

Furthermore, not everyone can garner as high a speaker fee as you, Toby.  Not
that you don't deserve it, its just not equal.  Also, many of us don't get
called to speak at these events because we haven't written books or are not
very good at promoting ourselves.  Its all good, this is just reality. 
Though not yours, obviously. 

I think PC Voices was a great event for the PC movement- taking it to the
masses, the mainstream, the capitalist patriarchal model- the ones who need
to get this info.  But PC Voices was HEAVILY subsidized by John Roulac as Wes
noted, without his help it probably wouldn't have been such a success. 
(Perhaps we could have had some sort of sliding scale for the NAPC also.)  I
personally am glad the PC Voices was successful, and that the PC Elite was
able to make some good cash speaking.  But to me the NAPC is not about the
elite, is is about the other 99%. 

I hate to phrase it this way, but I do see PC becoming the model of
capitalism that Scott warned us of- where a small group of the regular
speakers are getting 99% of the speaking gigs and design jobs, while the
other 1% subsidize their PC career with outside work.  To me the NAPC is
about sharing this wealth- of giving those who normally don't get the calls
up on stage.  (I know several speakers who have A LOT less field experience
than me, who are full on teaching because of a few good career moves.  I am
not bitter because I have enough, I am just making an observation.  Is this
what we want to create for PC?)

I have a solution/suggestion.  For those who feel that they should be paid to
speak at the NAPC, why don't you put a donation jar at the podium, or pass
the hat during your talk?  I am sure nobody would object.  I tell you why I
wouldn't- because I would feel like a dick unless I really needed it. 

How much do you need in order to feel motivated to speak?  This to me is the
real scarcity situation going on here-  feeling like you cannot afford to
speak for free, for fear of denigrating your own work.  I was delighted to
see Darren Doherty, one of the world's leading PC Designers, take the stage
at the last minute during the IPC Conference in Cuba- for free.  This to me
shows that he has the 3rd ethic firmly rooted in his heart.

Furthermore, I suggest we take up donations for the organizers during the
event, who apparently are doing a lot of this work for free- they deserve
this support more than speakers IMO.  This was one unintended consequence of
keeping the event fees so low (agreed not the best design, but this is the
first in a series hopefully so there are always better next times).  I agree
that we could have charged another $50 and most people wouldn't have felt the
pang, but why not save that for those who can voluntarily donate to the event
organizers, those who can afford it?  Like you and I, Toby. 

I am good for $50.  Heck, lets make it $100.  How's that for abundance
consciousness?

Loren Luyendyk
(805)-452-8249
Accredited Permaculture Teacher, PRI-AUS
ISA Certified Arborist WE-7805A
www.sborganics.com
www.surferswithoutborders.org
www.globalpermaculture.com




> From: lakinroe@silcom.com
> Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2014 14:32:34 -0700
> To: permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
> Subject: Re: [permaculture] NAPC: Scarcity?
>
> hi
>  i agree with Toby i agree but what scale would be fair for each speaker
>that presented , my understanding when NAPC was first organized/conceived 
>that they did not want taking heads , it would be a series of panels/circles
>that you could or could not be part of if you attended, that has changed i
>think,
>
> i love Permaculture Voices and supported Diego from the start with hand
> outs are our events and also at many festivals. I felt with needed a
> professional conference for PC. I knew he would be sweating it as PC
> community waits till the last moment to register. John Roulac of Nutiva
> save the day by subsidizing  a  low fee that drew the large numbers in the
> end. The end result is that Diego was able to have a successful event and
> now is willing to host this next year.
> It could of failed and never happen again as many PC events get starved
> because of lack of support. the International Permaculture Conference
> /Convergence is always facing a lack of financial support for all the same
> reasons Toby has mentioned.
>
> I agree everyone need to be part of sharing economy and yes share resources 
> to create a economy that supports the change
>
> more later thanks Toby
> wes
> ps at Santa Barbara Permaculture Network we have always paid PC teachers
> and travel expenses since our first event in 1997 . 
>
>
>
>
> On Aug 3, 2014, at 12:09 PM, Toby Hemenway <toby@patternliteracy.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Aug 1, 2014, at 12:55 PM, Michael Pilarski via permaculture
> > <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Can you imagine how much it would cost
> >> if we had to pay each one of them what they currently get paid for
> >> giving a
> >> workshop or keynote speech!?  . . .  We don’t want to set up a
> >> hierarchy. Come because you are excited about participating ... not
> >> because you
> >> are getting paid.
> >
> > Since you mention it publicly, I gather that a number of presenters have
> > asked if they can be compensated for their work. (Warning: rant ahead,
> > and Skeeter, this isn't personal--since I've gotten, like, 8 copies of
> > this notice, it's repeatedly hit one of my hot buttons.)
> >
> > What if a corporation or plantation boss had said, “Can you imagine how
> > much our products would cost if we paid our workers fairly?” Permies
> > don’t get a pass on that just because we’re doing good work; corporations
> > think they are too. It’s also a guilt-tripping argument, which is kind of
> > embarrassing.
> >
> > Here's the answer to the question: Given the expected 500 attendees,
> > another $50 would generate $25,000. More than enough to pay everyone
> > well, including the hard-working organizers. Since the fee structure of
> > NAPC already has a set of $50 tiers, one more would have fit in fine.
> >
> > People aren't asking to be paid just to get money. It's hard work to put
> > a talk together (takes me 40-80 hours for a 90-minute talk), and if our
> > work yields no return, we've designed a bad system that burns us out.
> > Remember "Get a yield?" Not to do so is unsustainable. We should be
> > modeling abundance, not scarcity. "Here, come be a permaculturist, stay
> > broke, live in scarcity, and get nothing for your hard work but good
> > feelings!"
> >
> >
> > The price of NAPC is ludicrously low. $150 for 3 days of presentations,
> > workshops, awesome conversation, meals, and camping? That’s just nuts!
> > For $50 more, NAPC could have compensated everyone well for their work
> > and had broader appeal. And at a regular conference rate, we could have
> > funded the projects we'll conceive there. I know a lot of people who
> > aren’t attending because it’s just the usual folks, camping in a field,
> > like every convergence.
> >
> > It feels like the guiding principle for NAPC is “let’s spend as little as
> > possible so we can charge as little as possible.” That’s a brutally
> > limiting design ethic. Imagine how much richer the event would be if the
> > ethic was, “How do we make this as awesome as we can, pay everyone fairly
> > for their work, and still find ways for everyone to afford it?”
> >
> > One of many ways is how Permaculture Voices did it: A block of very
> > expensive, full-price tickets (which sold well because not every
> > permaculturist is poor!), blocks at half and one-quarter price, and a
> > large block of free tickets. They had 650 very diverse attendees, and a
> > presenters budget of, I estimate, over $100,000 to pay 70 speakers very
> > well. There are many ways to design it to be affordable for all, beyond
> > “do it as cheap as we can.”
> >
> > When 500 people come together, they can generate a surplus that will
> > provide enough for everyone. How did NAPC miss that resource? (I assume,
> > since NAPC isn't paying others for working, that NAPC staff, too, are all
> > doing this for free).
> >
> > It’s not that there is a “hierarchy,” as the letter puts it. There is
> > true diversity in skills, experience, and income. To deny that reality,
> > to not take advantage of it, is poor design.
> >
> > Please, let’s get over the idea that everyone in permaculture is poor,
> > that there is no money out there, that this is a world of scarcity. What
> > kind of a vision to hold is that? This is a huge limitation for
> > permaculture that we have to break out of!
> >
> > Maybe we need a session at NAPC on how to break the scarcity mentality of
> > permaculture.
> >
> > Toby
> > http://patternliteracy.com
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > permaculture mailing list
> > permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
> > subscribe/unsubscribe|user config|list info|make a donation toward list
> > maintenance:
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture
> > message archives:  http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/permaculture/
> > Google message archive search:
> > site: lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/permaculture [searchstring]
> > Permaculture Institute USA http://permaculture.org
> > How to permaculture your urban lifestyle
> > http://www.ipermie.net
> > Avant Geared  http://www.avantgeared.com
> > https://plus.google.com/+Avantgeared
> > Permaculture: -- portal to an expanding global network of landtech
> > pioneers -- who are designing ecological land use systems with integrated
> > elements for synergy, sustainability, regeneration and enhanced
> > nature-compatible human habitat

>
> _______________________________________________
> permaculture mailing list
> permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
> subscribe/unsubscribe|user config|list info|make a donation toward list
> maintenance:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture
> message archives:  http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/permaculture/
> Google message archive search:
> site: lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/permaculture [searchstring]
> Permaculture Institute USA http://permaculture.org
> How to permaculture your urban lifestyle
> http://www.ipermie.net
> Avant Geared  http://www.avantgeared.com
> https://plus.google.com/+Avantgeared
> Permaculture: -- portal to an expanding global network of landtech pioneers
> -- who are designing ecological land use systems with integrated elements
> for synergy, sustainability, regeneration and enhanced nature-compatible
> human habitat

                       
_______________________________________________
permaculture mailing list
permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
subscribe/unsubscribe|user config|list info|make a donation toward list
maintenance:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture
message archives:  https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/permaculture/
Google message archive search:
site: lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/permaculture [searchstring]
Permaculture Institute USA http://permaculture.org
How to permaculture your urban lifestyle
http://www.ipermie.net
Avant Geared  http://www.avantgeared.com
https://plus.google.com/+Avantgeared
Permaculture: -- portal to an expanding global network of landtech pioneers
-- who are designing ecological land use systems with integrated elements for
synergy, sustainability, regeneration and enhanced nature-compatible human
habitat
>From lakinroe@silcom.com Sun Aug 3 23:07:48 2014
Return-Path: <lakinroe@silcom.com>
X-Original-To: permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
Received: by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix, from userid 20217)
id 7327121FFB; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 23:07:48 -0400 (EDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
mailman1.ibiblio.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from zrelay02.impulse.net (zrelay02.impulse.net [207.154.70.52])
by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9AE32184A
for <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>;
Sun, 3 Aug 2014 23:07:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by zrelay02.impulse.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDFCAF8049;
Sun, 3 Aug 2014 20:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zrelay02.impulse.net
Received: from zrelay02.impulse.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (zrelay02.impulse.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 10024)
with ESMTP id aQM0bRn5wpoY; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 20:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.103] (174-34-81-5.static-ip.telepacific.net
[174.34.81.5])
by zrelay02.impulse.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2964BF802D;
Sun, 3 Aug 2014 20:07:39 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Wesley Roe and Santa Barbara Permaculture Network <lakinroe@silcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <1407120938.18885.YahooMailNeo@web140801.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2014 20:07:37 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CC2DA5AC-990C-4C2F-BE85-D5D4BFC952D1@silcom.com>
References: <1406922906.88876.YahooMailNeo@web142306.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>,
<578433D6-C8B8-4524-83DB-439FCE38BE94@patternliteracy.com>,
<6E7843ED-14E9-4322-903A-64EF1FC41881@silcom.com>
<BLU176-W26C0E295AE9ADC1E4A4026A8E20@phx.gbl>
<1407120938.18885.YahooMailNeo@web140801.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
To: Koreen Brennan <cory8570@yahoo.com>,
permaculture <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Subject: Re: [permaculture] NAPC: Scarcity?
X-BeenThere: permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: permaculture <permaculture.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/permaculture>,
<mailto:permaculture-request@lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/permaculture/>
List-Post: <mailto:permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa@lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture>,
<mailto:permaculture-request@lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 03:07:48 -0000

thanks Koreen and Loren
I so appreciate all the work to put it on , yes let�s continue the
discussion at NAPC
wes
On Aug 3, 2014, at 7:55 PM, Koreen Brennan via permaculture
<permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org> wrote:

> Thanks for this conversation - I'm hoping that many more like it happen at
> NAPC, and before and after. That is one reason I have been spending the
> dozens of hours the core organizers are putting in on this to make it
> happen.
>
> As Loren says, there are multiple factors to consider (and the following is
> my opinion only, not an official pronouncement from NAPC).
>
> 1. This is the first NAPC that has ever been done - we don't know what the
> market will bear so we started low. We also got a late start organizing and
> starting from scratch, we felt we needed to spend some time doing some
> internal organizing. There were and still are many unknowns. To commit to
> paying speakers their going rate when we ourselves would be putting in not
> 40 hours but more like 800+ hours each - on a volunteer basis unless or
> until we met all other expenses - seems unfair and impractical to me. We
> are not doing this as a commercial model, like "Voices" (and I don't think
> it is the best analogy to compare us to them - we are doing a completely
> different activity and purpose). It can be lot of pressure for someone to
> book even one outside speaker and make enough sales to make it worthwhile.
> How much more pressure would it be to book a few dozen, our first time out
> of the gate? We are all busy professionals and have day jobs, and are doing
> this part time. We had to make some judgement calls, and we did so. We
> figured that no matter what we did, we would disappoint some people.
>
> 2. For me personally, it was more important to get a wide diversity there
> than just people who could afford higher ticket prices. For those who are
> already financially successful, it may be unreal that many people are
> struggling to create careers in a field that is far from mainstream or
> recognized in many areas, but what Loren says is true - for many people,
> price is a deciding factor. Should permaculture only be for those who can
> afford or are willing to pay mainstream corporate prices for events? I can
> only scratch the surface on this issue. I agree that our field should be
> garnering much more money than we are, and I am working toward that in my
> own region. But we're trying to do something a bit different with this
> event.
>
> 3. We are focused on making this more of a community event than
> presentation forum. There are many more panels, round tables, open spaces,
> gatherings, breakouts, etc than presenters. We have a lot to work out
> amongst ourselves. This issue of making a decent living in permaculture is
> just one of many issues that concern a lot of us. I think we need to have
> some conversations about these matters as a movement - how can we work
> together to create a better design for professionals than what we have now?
> How can we expand our delivery and effectiveness? How can we collaborate
> more effectively on many of the issues confronting this planet? What are
> all of our options?
>
> 4. As Loren pointed out, money is far from the only yield at an event like
> this. We are hoping to see many, many yields come from this event, and I
> personally feel that some of them will be far more important than fees that
> any of us may or may not get paid.
>
> Best,
>
> Koreen Brennan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Koreen Brennan
>
>
> Permaculture Design and Consulting, Florida
> Permaculture Design Courses - Tampa Bay and Costa Rica
> Natural Building Pine Ridge Lakota Reservation
> Edible Landscape Advanced Course
> Financial Permaculture
>
> www.growpermaculture.com
> www.facebook.com/growpermaculturenow
>
>
>
> On Sunday, August 3, 2014 10:13 PM, loren luyendyk <loren@sborganics.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Toby- you bring up good points, but I think you may be missing an important
> one. This is not about scarcity, it is about reality. $150 is a lot of
> money to some people, especially when you consider travel to get to the
> event.
>
> I was one proponent of keeping the cost of the event low enough so that
> folks from "the rest of the Americas" could join (especially after the way
> overpriced Cuba IPC). This event is not just for well-to-do USAliens, it
> is the NORTH AMERICAN Permaculture Convergence. There are other countries
> in North America other than the USA and Canada, "the rest of them" (ie
> Mexico) will sadly not be equally represented because of- you guessed it-
> money.
>
> And what about the rest of the PC movement, the other 99%? Those who are
> just getting started, or those who are not as fortunate as some of us, who
> may have travels expenses that far exceed the cost of the event- so in
> effect it becomes a $1000+ affair? Many in the PC movement deliberately
> avoid making money (reduce the need to earn) because they are not into
> supporting a degenerative, fiat based currency system. Also, many are on
> the frontier, are pioneers in their area (geographically) or field, who are
> waiting for the rest of the world to catch up. For this reason they may
> not earn what they deserve, or will soon.
>
> It is easy for us to type on our $1200 computers how we should be
> compensated for our work in order to obtain a yield (ie pay off the
> computer). Is money the only yield here? What about inspiring the up and
> comers? What about sharing what works and what doesn't with your peers?
> What about tithing? I can think of dozens of other yields that will be
> harvested that far outweigh the speakers fee.
>
> I am honored to be a speaker at this event. I am honored to do it for
> free. I get paid very well with my work as a permaculture designer and
> teacher, and I am able to subsidize my trip to the NAPC with this income.
> I am glad to support this historic event in this way.
>
> Furthermore, not everyone can garner as high a speaker fee as you, Toby.
> Not that you don't deserve it, its just not equal. Also, many of us don't
> get called to speak at these events because we haven't written books or are
> not very good at promoting ourselves. Its all good, this is just reality.
> Though not yours, obviously.
>
> I think PC Voices was a great event for the PC movement- taking it to the
> masses, the mainstream, the capitalist patriarchal model- the ones who need
> to get this info. But PC Voices was HEAVILY subsidized by John Roulac as
> Wes noted, without his help it probably wouldn't have been such a success.
> (Perhaps we could have had some sort of sliding scale for the NAPC also.)
> I personally am glad the PC Voices was successful, and that the PC Elite
> was able to make some good cash speaking. But to me the NAPC is not about
> the elite, is is about the other 99%.
>
> I hate to phrase it this way, but I do see PC becoming the model of
> capitalism that Scott warned us of- where a small group of the regular
> speakers are getting 99% of the speaking gigs and design jobs, while the
> other 1% subsidize their PC career with outside work. To me the NAPC is
> about sharing this wealth- of giving those who normally don't get the calls
> up on stage. (I know several speakers who have A LOT less field experience
> than me, who are full on teaching because of a few good career moves. I am
> not bitter because I have enough, I am just making an observation. Is this
> what we want to create for PC?)
>
> I have a solution/suggestion. For those who feel that they should be paid
> to speak at the NAPC, why don't you put a donation jar at the podium, or
> pass the hat during your talk? I am sure nobody would object. I tell you
> why I wouldn't- because I would feel like a dick unless I really needed it.
>
>
> How much do you need in order to feel motivated to speak? This to me is
> the real scarcity situation going on here- feeling like you cannot afford
> to speak for free, for fear of denigrating your own work. I was delighted
> to see Darren Doherty, one of the world's leading PC Designers, take the
> stage at the last minute during the IPC Conference in Cuba- for free. This
> to me shows that he has the 3rd ethic firmly rooted in his heart.
>
> Furthermore, I suggest we take up donations for the organizers during the
> event, who apparently are doing a lot of this work for free- they deserve
> this support more than speakers IMO. This was one unintended consequence
> of keeping the event fees so low (agreed not the best design, but this is
> the first in a series hopefully so there are always better next times). I
> agree that we could have charged another $50 and most people wouldn't have
> felt the pang, but why not save that for those who can voluntarily donate
> to the event organizers, those who can afford it? Like you and I, Toby.
>
> I am good for $50. Heck, lets make it $100. How's that for abundance
> consciousness?
>
> Loren Luyendyk
> (805)-452-8249
> Accredited Permaculture Teacher, PRI-AUS
> ISA Certified Arborist WE-7805A
> www.sborganics.com
> www.surferswithoutborders.org
> www.globalpermaculture.com
>
>
>
>
>> From: lakinroe@silcom.com
>> Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2014 14:32:34 -0700
>> To: permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
>> Subject: Re: [permaculture] NAPC: Scarcity?
>>
>> hi
>> i agree with Toby i agree but what scale would be fair for each speaker
>> that presented , my understanding when NAPC was first organized/conceived
>> that they did not want taking heads , it would be a series of
>> panels/circles that you could or could not be part of if you attended,
>> that has changed i think?
>>
>> i love Permaculture Voices and supported Diego from the start with hand
>> outs are our events and also at many festivals. I felt we needed a
>> professional conference for PC. I knew he would be sweating it as PC
>> community waits till the last moment to register. John Roulac of Nutiva
>> save the day by subsidizing a low fee that drew the large numbers in the
>> end. The end result is that Diego was able to have a successful event and
>> now is willing to host this next year.
>> It could of failed and never happen again as many PC events get starved
>> because of lack of support. the International Permaculture Conference
>> /Convergence is always facing a lack of financial support for all the same
>> reasons Toby has mentioned.
>>
>> I agree everyone needs to be part of sharing economy and yes share
>> resources to create a economy that supports the change
>>
>> more later thanks Toby
>> wes
>> ps at Santa Barbara Permaculture Network we have always paid PC teachers
>> and travel expenses since our first event in 1997 .
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 3, 2014, at 12:09 PM, Toby Hemenway <toby@patternliteracy.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 1, 2014, at 12:55 PM, Michael Pilarski via permaculture
>>> <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can you imagine how much it would cost
>>>> if we had to pay each one of them what they currently get paid for
>>>> giving a
>>>> workshop or keynote speech!? . . . We don�t want to set up a
>>>> hierarchy. Come because you are excited about participating ... not
>>>> because you
>>>> are getting paid.
>>>
>>> Since you mention it publicly, I gather that a number of presenters have
>>> asked if they can be compensated for their work. (Warning: rant ahead,
>>> and Skeeter, this isn't personal--since I've gotten, like, 8 copies of
>>> this notice, it's repeatedly hit one of my hot buttons.)
>>>
>>> What if a corporation or plantation boss had said, �Can you imagine how
>>> much our products would cost if we paid our workers fairly?� Permies
>>> don�t get a pass on that just because we�re doing good work; corporations
>>> think they are too. It�s also a guilt-tripping argument, which is kind of
>>> embarrassing.
>>>
>>> Here's the answer to the question: Given the expected 500 attendees,
>>> another $50 would generate $25,000. More than enough to pay everyone
>>> well, including the hard-working organizers. Since the fee structure of
>>> NAPC already has a set of $50 tiers, one more would have fit in fine.
>>>
>>> People aren't asking to be paid just to get money. It's hard work to put
>>> a talk together (takes me 40-80 hours for a 90-minute talk), and if our
>>> work yields no return, we've designed a bad system that burns us out.
>>> Remember "Get a yield?" Not to do so is unsustainable. We should be
>>> modeling abundance, not scarcity. "Here, come be a permaculturist, stay
>>> broke, live in scarcity, and get nothing for your hard work but good
>>> feelings!"
>>>
>>>
>>> The price of NAPC is ludicrously low. $150 for 3 days of presentations,
>>> workshops, awesome conversation, meals, and camping? That�s just nuts!
>>> For $50 more, NAPC could have compensated everyone well for their work
>>> and had broader appeal. And at a regular conference rate, we could have
>>> funded the projects we'll conceive there. I know a lot of people who
>>> aren�t attending because it�s just the usual folks, camping in a field,
>>> like every convergence.
>>>
>>> It feels like the guiding principle for NAPC is �let�s spend as little as
>>> possible so we can charge as little as possible.� That�s a brutally
>>> limiting design ethic. Imagine how much richer the event would be if the
>>> ethic was, �How do we make this as awesome as we can, pay everyone fairly
>>> for their work, and still find ways for everyone to afford it?�
>>>
>>> One of many ways is how Permaculture Voices did it: A block of very
>>> expensive, full-price tickets (which sold well because not every
>>> permaculturist is poor!), blocks at half and one-quarter price, and a
>>> large block of free tickets. They had 650 very diverse attendees, and a
>>> presenters budget of, I estimate, over $100,000 to pay 70 speakers very
>>> well. There are many ways to design it to be affordable for all, beyond
>>> �do it as cheap as we can.�
>>>
>>> When 500 people come together, they can generate a surplus that will
>>> provide enough for everyone. How did NAPC miss that resource? (I assume,
>>> since NAPC isn't paying others for working, that NAPC staff, too, are all
>>> doing this for free).
>>>
>>> It�s not that there is a �hierarchy,� as the letter puts it. There is
>>> true diversity in skills, experience, and income. To deny that reality,
>>> to not take advantage of it, is poor design.
>>>
>>> Please, let�s get over the idea that everyone in permaculture is poor,
>>> that there is no money out there, that this is a world of scarcity. What
>>> kind of a vision to hold is that? This is a huge limitation for
>>> permaculture that we have to break out of!
>>>
>>> Maybe we need a session at NAPC on how to break the scarcity mentality of
>>> permaculture.
>>>
>>> Toby
>>> http://patternliteracy.com
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> permaculture mailing list
>>> permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
>>> subscribe/unsubscribe|user config|list info|make a donation toward list
>>> maintenance:
>>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture
>>> message archives: https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/permaculture/
>>> Google message archive search:
>>> site: lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/permaculture [searchstring]
>>> Permaculture Institute USA http://permaculture.org
>>> How to permaculture your urban lifestyle
>>> http://www.ipermie.net
>>> Avant Geared http://www.avantgeared.com
>>> https://plus.google.com/+Avantgeared
>>> Permaculture: -- portal to an expanding global network of landtech
>>> pioneers -- who are designing ecological land use systems with integrated
>>> elements for synergy, sustainability, regeneration and enhanced
>>> nature-compatible human habitat
>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> permaculture mailing list
>> permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
>> subscribe/unsubscribe|user config|list info|make a donation toward list
>> maintenance:
>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture
>> message archives: https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/permaculture/
>> Google message archive search:
>> site: lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/permaculture [searchstring]
>> Permaculture Institute USA http://permaculture.org
>> How to permaculture your urban lifestyle
>> http://www.ipermie.net
>> Avant Geared http://www.avantgeared.com
>> https://plus.google.com/+Avantgeared
>> Permaculture: -- portal to an expanding global network of landtech
>> pioneers -- who are designing ecological land use systems with integrated
>> elements for synergy, sustainability, regeneration and enhanced
>> nature-compatible human habitat
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> permaculture mailing list
> permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
> subscribe/unsubscribe|user config|list info|make a donation toward list
> maintenance:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture
> message archives: https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/permaculture/
> Google message archive search:
> site: lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/permaculture [searchstring]
> Permaculture Institute USA http://permaculture.org
> How to permaculture your urban lifestyle
> http://www.ipermie.net
> Avant Geared http://www.avantgeared.com
> https://plus.google.com/+Avantgeared
> Permaculture: -- portal to an expanding global network of landtech pioneers
> -- who are designing ecological land use systems with integrated elements
> for synergy, sustainability, regeneration and enhanced nature-compatible
> human habitat
> _______________________________________________
> permaculture mailing list
> permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
> subscribe/unsubscribe|user config|list info|make a donation toward list
> maintenance:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture
> message archives: https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/permaculture/
> Google message archive search:
> site: lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/permaculture [searchstring]
> Permaculture Institute USA http://permaculture.org
> How to permaculture your urban lifestyle
> http://www.ipermie.net
> Avant Geared http://www.avantgeared.com
> https://plus.google.com/+Avantgeared
> Permaculture: -- portal to an expanding global network of landtech pioneers
> -- who are designing ecological land use systems with integrated elements
> for synergy, sustainability, regeneration and enhanced nature-compatible
> human habitat





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page