Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

pcplantdb - Re: [pcplantdb] Component areas in issue tracker

pcplantdb@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: pcplantdb

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Stephanie Gerson <sgerson@stanfordalumni.org>
  • To: <john@eco-living.net>, Permaculture Plant Database <pcplantdb@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: [pcplantdb] Component areas in issue tracker
  • Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:16:42 -0800

What is the difference between:

Does it work right?

and

Does the infrastructure work right?

just curious ;)

And what about: does it feel right/is it easy to use?

thanks John,
*s

------ Original Message ------
Received: 11:38 PM PST, 03/23/2005
From: John Schinnerer <john@eco-living.net>
To: PCPLANTDB <pcplantdb@lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: [pcplantdb] Component areas in issue tracker

Aloha,

Working on Roundup...

For now I am thinking of having the following choices for the
'component' identifier for an issue:

Functional
Graphical
Content
Hosting

In other words:

Does it work right?
Does it look right?
Does it present 'correct' information?
Does the infrastructure work right?

..this is what worked reasonably well for web development testing in an
issue tracker I helped create years ago. If anyone has any strong
thoughts on this please shout out...can be modified/enhanced as we go if
more/different proves necessary.

John S.


--

John Schinnerer - MA, Whole Systems Design
------------------------------------------
- Eco-Living -
Whole Systems Design Services
People - Place - Learning - Integration
john@eco-living.net
http://eco-living.net
_______________________________________________
pcplantdb mailing list
pcplantdb@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/pcplantdb




+++++++++++++++
Stephanie Gerson
sgerson@stanfordalumni.org
(c) 415.871.5683


____________________________________________________________________






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page