Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Tanach book order - different in Christian Bibles

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Philippe Wajdenbaum" <pwajdenbaum AT hotmail.com>
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Tanach book order - different in Christian Bibles
  • Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 14:17:13 +0000

Dear Karl,

Thank you for your answer. I thought that it was possible to discuss this subject here, by having read some of the archives of the list; I understand it is very sensitive. I do not want to make proselytism, just to express my opinions. I have been reading a lot of Greek litterature and just find strange how many parallels are to be found with the Tanakh. So I started asking myself questions. The book of Micheal Astour is a very good one, as he points many of those parallels; after him came Martin West and his "East face of Helicon".
But these authors think that ideas only travel from East to West, never the other way around. This can be called proselytism also, in your definition of the term. It is true that many mythical characters and Greek gods have a semitic origin. But what the Greeks knew from the semitic world seems more like Cananean or Phenician culture rather biblical culture. For instance Belos derives from semitic god Baal or Bel, Melikertes from Melkart, the biblical Molekh; and also Adonis that comes from Tammuz, as you mentionned. These gods are the idols despised by the authors of the Tanakh; but I don't think the Greeks knew anything directly from the Tanakh. For instance, Herodotos knew only Syria and Palestine. Yet you can find many parallel themes with the Bible in his Historia. Did he copied the Bible, and deliberately hid his knowledge of Judea? Maybe.

2) This is a forum for discussing the language found in Tanakh, not
its authorship.

I find it difficult to separate written language from the author.

Just as there was trade in objects, so there was trade in ideas as
well. The Jewish diaspora, started under Nebuchadnezzar, could very
well have reached Greece by the time of Plato, so you can't rule out
his being influenced by and taking examples from Hebrew sources. Jews
and Jewish ideas were known in Hellenistic cities in Asia Minor by
Plato's time.

Indeed; but my problem is that I find very accurate parallels with all the famous Greeks writers, from Homer to Apollonios Rhodius. The Fathers of the Church claimed that all of them stole from the Bible. This was a rational point of view, for men who knew both litteratures very well. I have come to the opposite conclusion. The reading of Plato's Laws is very disturbing. I recommand it to anyone who has some curiosity, not wanting to push my opinions about the dating. These similarities raise a huge question, and I find it troubling that no one, either in universities or anywhere, is ready to discuss it.

You admit "But yes, these theories do ruin both judaism and
christianism if they are right." That admission is enough to say that
you are not to push your beliefs, for that is proselytism to your
religion. You may mention your beliefs, and others on this list may
counter with interpretations based on their beliefs, but in the
absence of historical data neither can insist in this forum that his
interpretation is the correct one. Proselytism is the venue of other
forums, please not here.

The ideas I express are not a religion, and I just wanted to have some opinions about them, and I do not expect others to agree; I think that what I say is correct, knowing many evidences that I am willing to share with you, not to convince you but just to make you realise, at least, of the great similarities with the Greek litterature. This can help for giving etymologies and focus on the topic of the hebrew language. But if the idea of a Greek influence is not acceptable here, I will not insist.


Regards,

Philippe Wajdenbaum


From: "K Randolph" <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Tanach book order - different in Christian Bibles
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 00:39:37 -0700

Philippe:

One of the rules on this forum is that we do not push our private
beliefs concerning the dating of Tanakh. I will invoke it here for the
following reasons:

1) All of us start with beliefs that cannot be rationally defended.
Not one of us starts with 100% rationality. For example, which is to
take precedence—history or a rationally defendable argument? The
Hellenistic model was to take rationality, while Tanakh and the New
Testament chose history (on this level, both Tanakh and the New
Testament stand in stark contrast to Hellenism, an argument against
either document being Hellenistic). But why choose one model over the
other? That's a matter of faith, yours is no less faith than mine,
just a different faith.

2) This is a forum for discussing the language found in Tanakh, not
its authorship. While the oldest examples of Tanakh are copies from
Qumran with a frustratingly few examples of Hebrew from other sources
from when Tanakh was allegedly written other than what is internal to
Tanakh, we have insufficient historical data either to prove or
disprove the internal dates. Thus whether one accepts them or not is a
matter of faith, yours is a faith that they are not accurate, mine a
faith that they are.

3) The late dating of Tanakh, with Ayrian centric invention of all
major themes and ideas, from the documentation I have seen, started
around 1800 among German rationalists who believed evolution (yes,
evolution predates Darwin by millennia, Aristotle, for example,
believed that evolution procedes through natural selection, Darwin's
supposed innovation). But was that an accurate depiction of history?
According to M.C. Astour in his book "Hellenosemitica" 1967, much of
Greek civilization, even religious beliefs, was an import to Greece
from West Semitic tribes living in what is now Turkey around 3,000
years ago; e.g. the Dionysius cult, even in the terms used in its
practice, show semitic influences from Tamuz worship, yet Dionysius is
known from Linear B documents. So who borrowed from whom?

You brought up the example of "sumphonia" as an example of Hellenism,
but is it? The Masoretes who added the vowel points were influenced by
Hellenism, but what about the author of Daniel? The unpointed text
could just as well be pronounced as "xiwamepaniyahe" or it could have
been an instrument imported from Greece (international trade existed
back then), thus the use of this term is not evidence of Hellenistic
period authorship. Your doubt that Nebuchadnezzar could have had such
an instrument is personal opinion, not historical evidence.

Just as there was trade in objects, so there was trade in ideas as
well. The Jewish diaspora, started under Nebuchadnezzar, could very
well have reached Greece by the time of Plato, so you can't rule out
his being influenced by and taking examples from Hebrew sources. Jews
and Jewish ideas were known in Hellenistic cities in Asia Minor by
Plato's time.

You admit "But yes, these theories do ruin both judaism and
christianism if they are right." That admission is enough to say that
you are not to push your beliefs, for that is proselytism to your
religion. You may mention your beliefs, and others on this list may
counter with interpretations based on their beliefs, but in the
absence of historical data neither can insist in this forum that his
interpretation is the correct one. Proselytism is the venue of other
forums, please not here.

To close a much wordier response than I expected, and knowing that you
are new to this list, while you are free to mention your beliefs and
how they influence your understanding of Tanakh, even to its dating,
we are not to push our beliefs as the only correct interpretation of
controversial subjects because that is proselytism.

Karl W. Randolph.

Ps. As for Daniel's 70 sevens of years, Jerusalem was not destroyed
and needed complete rebuilding after Antiochus IV Epimanes, neither
was there a seven year war starting 483 years later, midway through
which sacrifices were stopped, yet both descriptions, as well as all
the other details of that prophecy, fit the rebuilding under Nehemiah.


> Regards,
>
> Philippe Wajdenbaum
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page