...
You can ignore me, that's no problem. But why were those others
"disproved"? Was it on the basis of theory, or new observation? ...
Aber entscheidend ist fu:r die Urspru:nglichkeit des $ die Thatsache,
dass dasselbe im Arabischen ganz anders reflectirt wird als &; jenes
na:mlich durch [Arabic Shin], dieses durch [Arabic sin] oder [Arabic
tha]. Mithin ist anzuerkennen, dass die alten Hebra:er mit ihrem #
zwei a:hnliche Laute ausdru:ckten, von denen aber der eine mit der
Zeit ganz den Laut des [Samekh] annahm.
... TheWhat, the DSS are minuscule? And the evidence from Ugarit? And many other smaller finds? In fact Noldeke's argument goes back to 1873 which puts it before the discoveries of the Amarna letters and the Cairo geniza as well. So there is plenty of new data to consider.
amount of new discoveries from known Biblical Hebrew in the last
century is miniscule, so what was it? For all intents and purposes, we
all are working from the same data.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.