xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java

List archive

Re: [XOM-interest] namespaces and the not() function

From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson AT gmail.com>
To: XOM API for Processing XML with Java <xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] namespaces and the not() function
Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 14:47:57 +0100

On 5 May 2012 10:03, Michael Kay <mike AT saxonica.com> wrote:

> Generally XPath 1.0 is a pretty lightweight spec which is probably why
> it has been so successful. It doesn't waste time discussing edge cases,
> which can make it very frustrating for implementors.
>
> Michael Kay
> Saxonica

There's surely a lesson there Mike? Not sure if James did it
deliberately, but the uptake (IMHO) defines a success?

Perhaps compare this with xlink, xpointer which go the other way?

regards

--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

Re: [XOM-interest] How to read attribute value from Nodes class. , (continued)