xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference"
- From: Peter Murray-Rust <pm286 AT cam.ac.uk>
- To: elharo AT metalab.unc.edu
- Cc: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference"
- Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2009 16:19:32 +0000
Many thanks...
Elliotte Harold wrote:
Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
Schemas are not turned on by default, and indeed are not part of the XOM model at all.
Understood and welcomed.
I accept this (reluctantly). Could not XOM parse the standalone="yes" message and so not pass the DTD address to Xerces?). I still don't understand where the error message comes from but it must be somewhere in the DTD structure on the W3C pages. I don't understand why a DTD has to reference a namespaceURI at all and why the error is generated in the way it is. Is Xerces producing a misleading error message? And is the W3C spec in error (it validates on their pages) or does Xerces report a spurious error?
However the design of XML is such that XOM cannot guarantee proper parsing unless it reads the entire DTD. Blame entity references and attribute value normalization. Yes, that's a design flaw in XML, but it's one XOM has to live with. This is why XOM deliberately always reads the entire DTD.
P.
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Elliotte Harold, 01/01/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Peter Murray-Rust, 01/01/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Elliotte Harold, 01/01/2009
- Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference", Peter Murray-Rust, 01/01/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Elliotte Harold, 01/01/2009
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Elliotte Harold, 01/01/2009
- Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference", Peter Murray-Rust, 01/01/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Elliotte Harold, 01/01/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Peter Murray-Rust, 01/01/2009
- Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference", Elliotte Harold, 01/01/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Elliotte Harold, 01/01/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Peter Murray-Rust, 01/01/2009
- Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference", Elliotte Harold, 01/01/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Peter Murray-Rust, 01/01/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Peter Murray-Rust, 01/01/2009
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Problem with "Missing scheme in absolute URI reference",
Peter Murray-Rust, 01/01/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.