XOM API for Processing XML with Java

["Benson Margulies" <bim2007 AT basistech.com>]

XOM is all about trees. If you don't want trees, don't use XOM at all. Google 
StaX. 

-----Original Message-----
From: xom-interest-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org 
[mailto:xom-interest-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Eric Wang
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 10:46 PM
To: Tatu Saloranta
Cc: xom-interest
Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Writing large XML documents

No, it isn't necessary for me to build a tree model. Forgive my ignorance, 
but I can't find any mention of the SAX or Stax writers in the XOM 
documentation. Does this require an additional library?


On Dec 17, 2007 10:36 PM, Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder AT yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- Eric Wang <jemroc AT gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi, I am attempting to write an XML file larger than available 
> > memory.
> > Looking over the tutorial, the section describing the toXML() method 
> > states "However, since this builds the entire document in memory, it 
> > can be problematic for large documents and less efficient than using 
> > a Serializer, which can stream the document."
>
> Is it necessary for you to build an intermediate tree model? If not, 
> you could just use SAX or Stax writers directly to produce xml content 
> of unlimited length, with minimal buffering.
>
> -+ Tatu +-
>
>
>
>       
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ______________ Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page.
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
_______________________________________________
XOM-interest mailing list
XOM-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/xom-interest