Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

xom-interest - Re: [XOM-interest] Writing large XML documents

xom-interest AT

Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Benson Margulies" <bim2007 AT>
  • To: "Eric Wang" <jemroc AT>, "Tatu Saloranta" <cowtowncoder AT>
  • Cc: xom-interest <xom-interest AT>
  • Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Writing large XML documents
  • Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:48:56 -0500

XOM is all about trees. If you don't want trees, don't use XOM at all. Google

-----Original Message-----
From: xom-interest-bounces AT
[mailto:xom-interest-bounces AT] On Behalf Of Eric Wang
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 10:46 PM
To: Tatu Saloranta
Cc: xom-interest
Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Writing large XML documents

No, it isn't necessary for me to build a tree model. Forgive my ignorance,
but I can't find any mention of the SAX or Stax writers in the XOM
documentation. Does this require an additional library?

On Dec 17, 2007 10:36 PM, Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder AT> wrote:
> --- Eric Wang <jemroc AT> wrote:
> > Hi, I am attempting to write an XML file larger than available
> > memory.
> > Looking over the tutorial, the section describing the toXML() method
> > states "However, since this builds the entire document in memory, it
> > can be problematic for large documents and less efficient than using
> > a Serializer, which can stream the document."
> Is it necessary for you to build an intermediate tree model? If not,
> you could just use SAX or Stax writers directly to produce xml content
> of unlimited length, with minimal buffering.
> -+ Tatu +-
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ______________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
XOM-interest mailing list
XOM-interest AT

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page