xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
- From: "Blaine R Southam" <bsoutham AT gmail.com>
- To: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Node.query final
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:16:51 -0600
Miachael,
I understand that breaking the interface contract is a bad thing. But how
is it that I would be breaking the interface contract? The only thing that
I'm doing is providing a different hardcoded value as the default. Rather
than using the default namespace of an empty string to the query method, I
would be providing a default of my specific namespace. It still conforms to
the XQuery/XPath specification.
-Blaine
On 9/19/06, Michael Kay <mike AT saxonica.com> wrote:
> It doesn't
> seem that it would be harmful to allow the method to be overriden.
>It wouldn't be harmful to allow it to be overridden by an implementation
>that fulfils the contract - that is, one which conforms to the
XQuery/XPath
>specifications.
-
[XOM-interest] Node.query final,
Blaine R Southam, 09/18/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Node.query final,
Elliotte Harold, 09/18/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Node.query final,
Blaine R Southam, 09/18/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Node.query final,
Michael Kay, 09/19/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Node.query final,
Blaine R Southam, 09/19/2006
- Re: [XOM-interest] Node.query final, Elliotte Harold, 09/25/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Node.query final,
Blaine R Southam, 09/19/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Node.query final,
Michael Kay, 09/19/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Node.query final,
Blaine R Southam, 09/18/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Node.query final,
Elliotte Harold, 09/18/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.