XOM API for Processing XML with Java

["Galip Aydin" <gaydin AT grids.ucs.indiana.edu>]

Hi Tatu,
By encoding I mean converting an XML document to binary format, and by 
decoding from binary to XML. I am using File Input and Output Streams to 
read/write the documents, but am not including the I/O accesses in my 
measurements.

I will do some more tests by applying Wolfgang's suggestions and post some 
measurements, as well as the XML files I am using for the tests.

Thanks,
Galip


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tatu Saloranta" <cowtowncoder AT yahoo.com>
To: <xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 8:31 PM
Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] BNUX Question


> --- Galip Aydin <gaydin AT grids.ucs.indiana.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi Galip, one quick question:
>
> > Wolfgang,
> > I've been doing some tests to compare BNUX and Fast
> > Infoset performance for
> > various document sizes, my findings are;
> > - Encoding: FI (with SAX) is almost twice as fast as
> > BNUX (with stax) ,
> > - Decoding: BNUX is 2 to 3 times faster than FI.
>
> Just to make sure, by encoding do you mean output
> (serialization), and by decoding reading (parsing)?
> This seems interesting, if so: on output side stax
> implementation should not have any effect. But it may
> be that using a buffered writer might help.
>
> There are far fewer configurable pieces on output side
> though, so this seems peculiar. I have usually seen
> performance ratios to be roughly similar for both
> input and output.
>
> -+ Tatu +-
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> XOM-interest mailing list
> XOM-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/xom-interest